TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ask HN: How do you like your programming editor?

3 pointsby kashifabout 13 years ago
For folks using a 'programmers editor' , for lack of a better term, like Emacs and Vi. Would you migrate to a fully functional editor that runs in the browser? Or would you prefer something that installs and runs from the desktop? It would help me immensely if you could explain the rationale for your choice.

8 comments

bad_allocabout 13 years ago
I would prefer the editor that runs locally because<p>1) I can code offline. I must admit, that i have to regularly unplug my Ethernet cable to avoid being to distracted. An online editor would encourage just tabbing into a site with distractions<p>2) I can code offline. If I don't have an internet connection for some reason I can still work. This is especially important for people with instable connections.<p>3) I doubt an online editor will be as customizable as emacs<p>4) I can run it as root, if necessary. I wouldn't dare to run my browser as root.<p>5) I see no advantage concerning the use of one editor on many platforms. If I copy my .emacs to any other (Linux) box I have the same functionality everywhere.
评论 #3660977 未加载
jarrodtaylorabout 13 years ago
Is there an advantage to having it run in a browser? Desktop-style web apps always feel out of place compared to native apps. I prefer apps that fade into the background when I'm using them so I can focus on what I'm doing, and if an app feels non-native it tends to be more distracting than useful. It's like adding one more layer of complexity.
t-crayfordabout 13 years ago
I much prefer an editor that runs from a terminal. I already notice speed issues (very occasionally) with vim in a terminal, I'd hate to have the lag that comes from running that in JS/on top of a browser. I don't think anything running in a gui would be usable either (because of speed). Terminal or bust.<p>Coding offline is also somewhat important for me.
pkambabout 13 years ago
I'd love an editor that used Chrome's tab strip. I can't stand how tabs work in most IDEs, and Chrome has done it exactly right.
评论 #3661187 未加载
flypunkabout 13 years ago
I always use vim and my setup won't allow non-cli editor.<p>I will typically open multiple ssh sessions to a remote machine and edit/test the code there from the different sessions.<p>As the saying goes, "I do it in production" ;)
oaxacamattabout 13 years ago
I like the tried and true, Geany. Geany is self-contained and does not require internet.
SamReidHughesabout 13 years ago
Give me a browser-based editor that runs in a console and I'll use that.
strayabout 13 years ago
I would definitely not migrate to any editor that runs in the browser -- unless my entire environment were in the browser -- which FSM willing, will never happen.<p>What you have to understand about my editor (emacs), is that it sucks.<p>There, I said it. Emacs sucks.<p>But emacs sucks less than everything else -- in part because it sits about as close to the bare metal as possible. And also because of emacs lisp, which I hate. And love...