TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ask HN: Math books that fundamentally changed the way to view or learn new math?

7 pointsby newsoulalmost 2 years ago
While self studying mathematics have you worked through any book that made a fundamental shift in your mind about how you viewed math in general and learn new math topics?<p>Can you write a few lines about those books?

7 comments

kwant_kiddoalmost 2 years ago
Not a book, but learning analysis changed my view on math. In my BSc in CS I only learned discrete math and maybe some algebra also a bit of geometry, but no analysis! Analysis is in my opinion harder to start with and maybe requires some more discipline. I remember when I finally understood how to actually use the extreme value theorem or realising how useful the triangle-inequality is for proving. Another cool thing about analysis is that all machinery you develop is used in applied math. The most useful math like Fourier, DE&#x27;s, Stoc. Proc, SP is all analysis under the hood.<p>Another thing that chanced my view on math (somewhat depressing I admit) is how important programming and systems knowledge is for using math in the real world. We had a math &#x27;expert&#x27;&#x2F;professor write an important routine at work for a year, and we ended up deleting all his code and rewriting it.<p>I am also biased in this regard. For me maths is just another tool, but math is not about writing algorithms it is about writing proofs.
ykonstantalmost 2 years ago
How to Prove it by George Pólya gave me good foundations and perspective on mathematical problem solving. The Mathematical Experience by Davis and Hersh was a fascinating introduction to the way mathematicians think and their perspective on mathematical challenges.<p>Just be warned that classics like the Mathematical Experience and Men of Mathematics by E.T. Bell tend to give a romanticized view of mathematical research, with anecdotes mostly by high profile mathematicians doing high profile mathematics, and with up-to-20th Century perspectives that don&#x27;t always hold up.
arisbe__almost 2 years ago
I think more creativity should be encouraged as if the student wasn&#x27;t just learning material but how to be a generative mathematician of interesting new ideas and proofs.<p>The Moore Method is a well known pedagogical method of teaching math courses.<p>A text for humanities students on higher-math (it is on the lower-higher fringe I suppose) that emphasizes this perspective but is not as spartan is <i>Mathematics A Creative Art</i> by Julia Wells Bower.<p>See &quot;The Moore Method&quot;, The Journal of Inquiry-Based Learning in Mathematics (JIBLM) has course notes <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jiblm.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jiblm.org&#x2F;</a><p>Authors I have enjoyed are Spivak &amp; Knuth but that is more about elegance and pedagogical style.
equilibriumalmost 2 years ago
I&#x27;ve just started reading a volume of books by Hung-Hsi Wu[0]. They are main audience is teachers of mathematics. Two other books that seem to offer a formal rigorous approach of teaching basic math are Principles of Mathematics by Carl Allendoerfer and Modern Algebra - A logical approach by Pearson, H. R and Allen, F. B<p>Needless to say, these books are focussed on High School math but should be sufficient preparation for courses on a more rigorous level.<p>My email is in my profile if you are looking for somebody to study with.<p>[0]<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;math.berkeley.edu&#x2F;~wu&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;math.berkeley.edu&#x2F;~wu&#x2F;</a>
评论 #36933938 未加载
082349872349872almost 2 years ago
<i>Conceptual Mathematics</i>: I had been exposed to &quot;abstract nonsense&quot; from CS papers before reading this book, but it was what made the penny drop on why we might wish to be more concerned with maps than with objects.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cambridge.org&#x2F;highereducation&#x2F;books&#x2F;conceptual-mathematics&#x2F;00772F4CC3D4268200C5EC86B39D415A#overview" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cambridge.org&#x2F;highereducation&#x2F;books&#x2F;conceptual-m...</a>
goaltenderalmost 2 years ago
The mostly I was impressed of university’s course of “Abstract algebra” (books I’ve read was in Russian, but I believe you could take any recommended literature from MIT courses). Understanding such things as “homomorphism”, “groups”, “vector linear space” will give a fundamental base for all other math disciplines and you will start to view math in more different side than it’s studied in school.
ecesenaalmost 2 years ago
The preface of Real &amp; Complex Analysis by W. Rudin.<p>It shows that exp is periodic, the first time I read it kind of blew my mind.