>Supreme Court might be sympathetic to some of the industry’s arguments<p>No surprise here, the US Supreme Court is now just like the rest of the US Gov, they are very happy to take bribes. And due to how the US Gov is structured, no way to stop them from holding out their hand. So getting appointed to that Court is a great gig, you do not even have to care about the law these days.
An industry that heavily lobbied for a law which heavily boosts their profits wants to heavily lobby against the destruction of such a law? Shocked. /s<p>Honestly I see no theoretical benefit to not allowing the government to negotiate. Maybe there is a practical one?
The NYT keeps getting worse. The article goes on and on and doesn't say anything (in the first ~75% or so that I muddled through) about how the proposed negotiations are different than the status quo.