this is super AI-generated. paradoxically, the PR release might be a better link: <a href="https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/city-of-hope-scientists-develop-targeted-chemotherapy-able-to-kill-all-solid-tumors-in-preclinical-research-301888576.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/city-of-hope-scient...</a>
Flagged. This is a source-free article created by an "AI editor" on a fluff website. Please stop upvoting it. The drug is still in Phase I trials and has NOT released any data on the patients yet.
"Percentage of the article that is generated by AI: 63%"<p>I appreciate the transparency, but just raises questions for me. What parts were generated by AI? What edits were made to correct the AI? Why did they feel AI was necessary?
Clinical trials on humans described here:<p><a href="https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/clinical-trials/intervention/pcna-inhibitor-aoh1996?redirect=true" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/clinical-trial...</a><p>Full paper on the drug here:<p><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6279569/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6279569/</a>