TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

My Lifetime Reading Plan

83 pointsby sdht0almost 2 years ago

17 comments

jbreckmckyealmost 2 years ago
I don&#x27;t believe sheer reading volume is the key here. I speak from some experience.<p>A long, long time ago, I did a degree in English literature. This was a bad name for it as a lot of it wasn&#x27;t English. Or literature for that matter. But over the course of three years I must have read in the order of 300 seriously sized books &#x2F; texts and a bunch of other secondary material.<p>Only a handful of memories stand out, out of a small swimming pool of ink. The Greek tragedies, some 20th century drama, and Chaucer.<p>What I really memorised though was what I _wrote_. My _essays_ are still easy to recall: parentheses in Thomas More; control of space in Ben Jonson; body integrity in Greek tragedy. I can still remember them 15 years on.<p>I didn&#x27;t really like my English degree, and I probably shouldn&#x27;t have done it, but I did gain a lot through the process of writing. I synthesised knowledge and developed my skill for spotting patterns. I forced myself to write original observations week in week out. I made myself start with an intimidating blank page and end with an artefact I could call my own.<p>(These things became part of my make-up as a software engineer, which is a job that rewards those willing to start from blank pages)<p>My advice is to match time spent reading with time spent writing. There&#x27;s a reason why traditional pedagogy entails writing essays, not just sheer volume of reading. You are as smart as what you can write, not what books are on your shelf.
评论 #37089306 未加载
评论 #37089290 未加载
评论 #37091275 未加载
VincentEvansalmost 2 years ago
For some time I’ve been consuming a lot of material on certain subjects I am interested in. Daily commentary, regular blogs, every interview a few people that I follow give, various background info related, etc. I’ve been doing it for over a year, often more than 3-4 hours per day. I’ve become quite informed, sure. But I have to admit that I don’t recall the contents of the information that I consumed all that well. Certainly not well enough to debate someone on the topic.<p>Perhaps this is a limitation of my own brain physiology, or deficiencies in the approach I’ve taken to consuming the information, and others would have faired better in my place. But this experience has made me seriously doubt the effectiveness of such consumption if the goal is to learn, as the OP advocates.<p>Thankfully that wasn’t necessarily a goal for me personally, I was just satisfying my interest in the subject I care deeply about.
评论 #37088533 未加载
评论 #37088657 未加载
评论 #37088699 未加载
评论 #37088532 未加载
tristoralmost 2 years ago
A lot of commenters are saying this is cringe or pretentious, and sure, it is a bit, but the advice provided here is also truthful. I don&#x27;t write or talk about my reading habits when I was younger, nor am I as dedicated to it at my current age as the OP is, but the idea of taking your time, reading old classics, and giving deep thought (really time to have deep thought) to the ideas within helping to expand your mind and your conception of the universe is definitely true. I used to read so obsessively that one of the punishments used for me was to take away my books, similar to how people take away phones from teenagers now.<p>If I look at my own life and career, as a college dropout who nevertheless attended for four years, both in my professional and my personal life most of what I know I either learned from books or from other people directly (or sometimes via YouTube). I don&#x27;t see it as elitist for the OP to point out his prestigious education when making this point as some other commenters do, but rather intended to reinforce that even if you have the world&#x27;s best college education it pales in comparison to what you can learn by simply giving yourself the space and time to think and reading through the source material upon which such an education would be based in some way, anyhow. To a large degree, what he&#x27;s describing trying to attempt was the entire point of a classical liberal arts education, but our current institutions largely fail to actually provide such an education anymore.<p>What&#x27;s so pretentious, ultimately, about sharing a methodology and the benefits of that methodology, when the source material is largely available to anyone for free or minimal cost via the Internet and their local library? I feel like it should be refreshing to know that there is still deep value in exploring the world through the written word without needing to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on schooling. It&#x27;s essentially the same thing that was said in the famous quote from Good Will Hunting: “You wasted $150,000 on an education you coulda got for $1.50 in late fees at the public library.”<p>So much of the writing about reading encourages people to use reading as a social activity, reading only what&#x27;s new and popular, or to read quickly thinking that it&#x27;s the volumes on your shelf that matter, this article is a somewhat refreshing take by making the very truthful point that you should take your time, read things that are old but important enough that people still remember them, and write about what you read and your observations.
评论 #37093785 未加载
menssenalmost 2 years ago
Ted&#x27;s booklist&#x2F;review websites have been my go-to for &quot;I need something to read&quot; for years now. He appears to not be maintaining them and some of the domains have expired, but here&#x27;s &quot;The New Canon&quot; (fiction since 1985):<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thenewcanon.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thenewcanon.com</a><p>And here&#x27;s an archive snapshot of the Conceptual Fiction (sci fi) one, which is now dead:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20160305124258&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;conceptualfiction.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20160305124258&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;conceptual...</a><p>The top comment here is about him giving the impression of being &quot;massively up his own arse.&quot; Maybe -- but I think his attempts to create something useful for others, which I have found genuinely useful, outweighs that. What does it say that he&#x27;s letting those attempts link-rot and writing on substack instead now?<p>I don&#x27;t know. I just know he has good taste in literature.
wnolensalmost 2 years ago
How do people physically read this much? How comfortable&#x2F;supportive is that chair?<p>The only way I&#x27;ve been able to sustain reading for more than a half hour without adverse postural effects is to lie on my side with an e-reader (+ pop-socket). In fact it&#x27;s the primary reason I read mostly on Kindle - to assume this posture.<p>I&#x27;ve even gone as far as building a contraption which lets me lie flat underneath it, and read hand-free. The issue with both methods of lying down to read is of course that I fall asleep :) (so much so that I keep a book on my nightstand as a sleep aid).<p>Otherwise, reading feels worse than working at a computer. I&#x27;m hunched over, similar to using a phone. Or I&#x27;m holding the book up a little higher and hold that tension in my arms&#x2F;shoulders&#x2F;neck.
评论 #37088951 未加载
评论 #37089058 未加载
评论 #37089042 未加载
评论 #37088913 未加载
redkabbagealmost 2 years ago
Even for a blogger, this guy uses the pronoun &quot;I&quot; way too much and his sentence structure is too simplistic to be as well read as he claims. Ever hear of a semicolon? Also, who reads Marcus Aurelius&#x27;s Meditations, Heidegger&#x27;s Being &amp; Time, and the Egyptian Book of the Dead and doesn&#x27;t take any notes?
评论 #37090197 未加载
评论 #37089577 未加载
jahnualmost 2 years ago
&gt; What fool reads all of Finnegans Wake out loud?<p>Well I heard it said from Joyce experts that reading Finnegans Wake and Ulysses, which was intended to be read out loud, is an important part to unlock some of the meanings.
评论 #37088709 未加载
评论 #37089175 未加载
jacobwilliamroyalmost 2 years ago
As a person who reads a lot of books (1 book every 1-3 weeks depending on its length) I can say most of them are crap garbage and I throw them in the garbage when I&#x27;m finished with them. A lot of murder mysteries. I don&#x27;t know why so many authors write murder mysteries. It&#x27;s so hard to make a mystery compelling in a book format, because I know no matter how opaque or confusing things are in the beginning, if I just keep reading eventually everything will be explained. Even if the explanation doesn&#x27;t make sense, there will be an explanation, eventually.<p>Maybe I should just stop reading random books. Follow Oprah&#x27;s book club or the commandant&#x27;s reading list or something like that.
评论 #37088571 未加载
评论 #37088666 未加载
hiqalmost 2 years ago
The author: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Ted_Gioia" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Ted_Gioia</a>
评论 #37088194 未加载
ameliusalmost 2 years ago
Ok, so reading a lot does not automatically make one a stellar writer.<p>(though not a bad one either)
Rant423almost 2 years ago
&quot;Great Books&quot; Lists: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;sonic.net&#x2F;~rteeter&#x2F;greatbks.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;sonic.net&#x2F;~rteeter&#x2F;greatbks.html</a>
f0ldalmost 2 years ago
Why are people so mean here? according to his bio he’s an author in his late 60s. It’s his job. And he’s telling us not to follow this yourself right at the start.
deadfecealmost 2 years ago
How I do wish the site owner would get rid of that newsletter signup modal. It&#x27;s right up there with slow site speed in terms of reasons I&#x27;ll leave a page.
评论 #37088299 未加载
tpoacheralmost 2 years ago
(fortunes) %<p>You&#x27;ll never see all the places, or read all the books. But fortunately, not all are recommended.
ojbyrnealmost 2 years ago
So many people making reading like an endless chore, rather than a lifetime love affair.
mahathualmost 2 years ago
Cringe
SilverBirchalmost 2 years ago
To be honest the overwhelming impression I get from this author is that he&#x27;s just massively up his own arse. I&#x27;ve read plenty of the books he name drops. I&#x27;ve spent an incredibly slow summer reading The Brothers Karazamov. But if you think that reading a few books on a topic has gotten you to the point where you &quot;match up with professors at Harvard or Oxford&quot; you just don&#x27;t understand the depth of knowledge you get from devoting your life to studying one specific area of study in depth. It&#x27;s important he lets you know he&#x27;s amazingly smart and well read, but it&#x27;s also important that you know he doesn&#x27;t do this for any lower moral imperatives such as looking smart, no it&#x27;s important to know that he does it for the pure pleasure. He takes no pride in quoting Ovid in the original latin, that&#x27;s just a silly side-effect of his pure path.<p>To learn he&#x27;s an American Jazz critic makes perfect sense, it&#x27;s almost exactly who you would expect to be this pretentious.
评论 #37088624 未加载
评论 #37088431 未加载
评论 #37089276 未加载
评论 #37088728 未加载
评论 #37089224 未加载
评论 #37088707 未加载
评论 #37088280 未加载
评论 #37089262 未加载
评论 #37088380 未加载
评论 #37088310 未加载
评论 #37088441 未加载
评论 #37089118 未加载
评论 #37089125 未加载
评论 #37088389 未加载
评论 #37089770 未加载