what the fuck is wrong with this author????<p>>developers care more about software’s access and ease of use than the purity of its license<p>how does that make any sense?<p>if access and ease of use is important, why the hell is "all rights reserved" mean oracle can fuck you in the ass backwards twice over? or "rightsholders" go after piratebay because they fucking copied a song? what the fuck!!!<p>this licensing discussion goes both ways. If i am not "allowed" to do commercial work on a particular LLM, i will not use it. If it stops me from copying or modifying the same, i will not use it.
open source does not prevent that. it just says "do not restrict freedom any more than what you were given". thats it.<p>if you try to make this into a stupid discussion about "ethics" and "nobody cares" then why not do away with DMCA?