Looks promising! Might be an interesting additional editor candidate in Create (<a href="http://createjs.org/" rel="nofollow">http://createjs.org/</a>). Though, Create is MIT and the wysihtml5 library used by this is GPL, so the licenses are not compatible.<p>Currently we use Hallo (<a href="http://bergie.github.com/hallo/" rel="nofollow">http://bergie.github.com/hallo/</a>) by default, and Aloha Editor (<a href="http://aloha-editor.org/" rel="nofollow">http://aloha-editor.org/</a>) with bundled integration.
Looks very nice, but I was hoping it would work more like Google Docs:<p>* The styles dropdown should update to reflect the style currently under the cursor.<p>* Hitting tab on a list should further indent the list item.<p>Those were just a couple of things I immediately noticed.
This is why I love open source. 30 minutes ago I was thinking "I wonder if there's a WYSIWYG editor that integrates with Bootstrap."<p>And now, here I am, reading about it.
It looks like the beginning of a very nice project!<p>I had a similar itch to scratch a few weeks ago when I wanted a nice simple editor for a project and modified the pagedown editor (the markdown editor from stackoverflow) to use bootstrap. Its here: <a href="https://github.com/samwillis/pagedown-bootstrap" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/samwillis/pagedown-bootstrap</a><p>You can see a demo here:
<a href="http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2690345/pagedown-bootstrap-demo/demo/browser/demo.html" rel="nofollow">http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2690345/pagedown-bootstrap-demo/demo...</a>
Nice presentation and looks to have real promise, but the source output looks just as bad as WordPress (unless it is just the Developer Tools). I see spans with inline CSS, empty divs and br's all over the place. It doesn't look very clean but if I am wrong please correct me.<p>Also, for practical use it needs indent controls for lists and there is a need to deal with links.
Totally broken for me. Firefox has weird selection behavior (trying to italicize one word often catches the previous one, next one, whole sentence - or works normal), with Chrome the buttons don't work at all and with Camino (older Gecko engine), I can't even place the cursor.
I don't want to be the spoil sport, but even though this looks nice, am I the only one here that still believes in hand-coding HTML?<p>(Disclaimer: I'm a zealot. I don't believe in IDEs, and I'll take grep over Eclipse any day of the week. <a href="http://xkcd.com/378/" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/378/</a>)
Sigh. Deal-breaker. Hitting 'Enter' creates <br>s and not <p>s and it looks like they don't plan to change it: <a href="https://github.com/xing/wysihtml5/issues/13" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/xing/wysihtml5/issues/13</a>
I currently use fckeditor for all client projects and I really want an alternative, so this looks perfect. I know it's probably not on top of your features list but inserting images would be a great add-on, most of my clients need it.
It certainly is simple and beautiful but it also needs to be functional. I selected H2 and typed some characters, then backspaced to the beginning where it reverted to normal text but did not update the UI (still showed as H2).
Now THIS is what I was looking for. Simple. Clean. Integrates with bootstrap.
In my case I need even less functionality. Just bold and lists. Will try this one!
Very nice, although I'd say the icon for numbered lists could be better; right now it simply looks like a chunkier version of the bulleted list button.
ok I am excited for this. Looks great and is super clean. If you could add support for predefined styles in the drop-down along with links and simple image insertion it could handle 90% of my wysiwyg needs for projects.<p>Of all the wysiwyg editors out there it seems that most are just too bloated and the lightweight ones are just too "ugly".
Given what I can do in notepad, this doesn't quite do it for me. Yes, notepad is not what-you-see-is-what-you-get, but it doesn't take that much to create a HTML repel and that followed by alt-tab allows me pretty much every thing I want. I am uncomfortable with 'some one else's idea of a good time' when it comes to feature selection---no <hr/>? Etc. Good idea in general, just not for me, not yet.
Are you happy to share your contact details? (If yes, say which)
Are you happy to share your contact details? (If yes, say which)<p>You may not be able to supply all this information at this stage but please do register as much as you can with them to be in with an opportunity to be part of this.
You may not be able to supply all this information at this stage but please do register as much as you can with them to be in with an opportunity to be part of this.