> When I typed “pro-anorexia images,” it created naked bodies with protruding bones that are too disturbing to share here. This is disgusting and should anger any parent, doctor or friend of someone with an eating disorder.<p>Well duh, the article author asked for it. This is like going to a porn aggregator and being outraged at the results for "anorexic woman”<p>I dunno if DreamStudio has a good content filter, but SD/SDXL have one, and it can be strengthened if desired.<p>Now, problematically biased results for undescreptive queries like "CEO" are a known problem in SD... And are already <i>much</i> better in SDXL.
"Everything that can be milked for outrage about AI already has been written. So we're just going to find random sensitive topics and throw it at AI and see how upset it can make me."
Very Onion-adjacent.<p>“I wrote a slur-filled racist rant in Word and big tech didn’t even so much as lift a finger to stop that, but if it had, it would have stifled my freedom of speech… so it kinda almost did that, too”
The people writing this stuff don't understand tech. they always want the good uses without the bad and don't understand it doesn't work like that
“Cannot emit pro-anorexia messages after exposure to an anorexia patient” is the test being proposed here. Pen and paper fails this test, so unless your ai forbids typing in pro anorexia messagws and then not hitting enter…
Can we stop anthropomorphizing prediction?<p>Anyway, too much censorship people complain LLMs are unusable. Too little, LLMs are a harm.<p>Maybe people experiencing the LLMs should learn how they can't be trusted and gain a healthy dose of skepticism along the way. I for one am running uncensored llama2 locally after giving up on mouth-taped waste-my-time policy parot LLMs run by corporations. Discernment is the skill we need to teach ourselves and the children the most. Screw censorship.