In general, I think the following rule applies to any tech company:<p>1. Keywords present or CV goes to trash<p>2. Good intro (2 lines) at the top of CV. Good structure (don't list a "Skills" section just hanging around alone. Put the skills you have used next to the jobs in which you have used them). Don't say "Used Java and K8s and CI/CD to build microservices" but "Built a microservice to handle incoming email requests from a third-party company" (or something better). This is for Engineering Managers who read CVs (not all of them read CVs)<p>3. Good layout/fonts. If your CV looks like it has been generate with Latex or similar, that leaves a good impression. This is for Engineers who read CVs (not all of them read CVs)<p>So, in general make sure you know that your CV is going to pass through all the layers tech companies have nowadays (e.g., if your CV is the most strucutured and beautiful latex-generated CV in the world, but it doesn't include any of the keywords HR is expecting -> it goes to trash)
For a startup you need to convince them that you can help them 1) solve their problems in the role they are offering the job 2) you can wear multiple hats and do things that are on the periphery/adjacent of the role they are offering 3) you are willing to given them an almost unlimited amount of your time and energy towards their day to day needs. You can’t do this thru your resume. You have to do this via your interview and other interactions with them. The resume, then, is simply a tool that allows you to potentially interact with them. Degrees from prestigious universities, or prior jobs at impressive companies or roles etc all are proxy mechanisms of signaling to your potential employer they should have a “interaction “ with you.<p>I know this sounds extremely cynical, but most(not all) startups are somebody’s grand efforts to make a shit ton of money for themselves (and smaller but meaningful sums for some people who join on that effort). There is nothing wrong here inherently just calling a spade a spade and if
You are failing to see this reality you may not understand how resume is just a tool that allows you get to a starting point of convincing someone that they should go be you some amt of money in return for your experience, skills etc. they are going to give thst money to someone and there are many takers. So they will try to maximize their ROI by giving it to the person who is most promising for “their endeavor “. As such while no two startups are alike you can abstract out the common needs across them and optimize your resume (and your interactions) to that end.
I don't know that the resume needs to be formatted differently. But startups and FAANG companies may be looking for different sorts of people.<p>In my startups, what I'm looking for is primarily three things: that the applicant's interests are in line with what the startup is doing, that the applicant will mesh well with the rest of the team, and that the applicant is good at problem-solving and working without a great deal of supervision.<p>The specific skills the applicant has are important, but probably not "top 3" important. As long as I'm comfortable that they enjoy learning new things and are good at it, any specific skill they lack can be provided through training.<p>A resume/CV that makes it easy for me to see how the applicant matches those needs is one that is more likely to successfully get a callback from me.
You need to use Comic Sans font for a startup, and Baskerville or Garamond for a FAANG.<p>When it comes to contents, "startups" come in all shapes and sizes, and they've got different requirements. There is no one-size fits all tbh.