TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ask HN: Best Fonts to Use on Websites?

10 pointsby ireallywantthatover 1 year ago
Apart from "system" fonts, which fonts do you think will make websites/blogs look instantly beautiful?

7 comments

throwaway154over 1 year ago
<p><pre><code> body { font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 16pt; line-height: 1.6; } h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 { font-family: serif; } </code></pre> That&#x27;s readable, thus a minimum standard for beauty.<p>Use of colour, spacing, case, image then become important for making powerful prioritisation, focus, structuring absorption&#x2F;presentation of your message. A specific font may or may not be part of this, and advantage of system fonts is not just their speed, but their familiarity - this can also be a disadvantage if intentionally seeking to disjoint a user or place them in a context associated with the font.
cebertover 1 year ago
I understand there&#x27;s an ongoing debate about using web fonts versus system fonts due to privacy concerns. I&#x27;ve experimented with disabling web fonts while browsing, but found that many sites become almost unusable without them.
评论 #37535104 未加载
cpachover 1 year ago
I like this showcase: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;beautifulwebtype.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;beautifulwebtype.com&#x2F;</a>
speedgooseover 1 year ago
It’s a system font on many devices but Roboto is a nice default.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;fonts.google.com&#x2F;specimen&#x2F;Roboto" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;fonts.google.com&#x2F;specimen&#x2F;Roboto</a><p>I also like IBM Plex Sans.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ibm.com&#x2F;plex&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ibm.com&#x2F;plex&#x2F;</a>
LPavearoadiover 1 year ago
I adore this font for everything, especially eBooks, but I haven&#x27;t tested it against a responsive web UI.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dafont.com&#x2F;apple-garamond.font" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dafont.com&#x2F;apple-garamond.font</a><p>I assume it&#x27;s an Apple knockoff, or maybe even an original.<p>I recommend it highly, especially for eBooks.
meristohmover 1 year ago
I far prefer fonts that are accessible to the most people. Anti-dyslexia fonts might be too odd at first, so I avoid using those for now. I&#x27;ve read that sans-serif is best for text on screens, and serif for text on paper. The font should err on the side of larger rather than smaller. Functional is beautiful.
DamonHDover 1 year ago
I like sites to be <i>readable</i>, quickly, and without leaking too much information to third parties. &#x27;Beautiful&#x27; Web fonts tilt against all of those metrics.
评论 #37537629 未加载
评论 #37536522 未加载