TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

More writers sue OpenAI for copyright infringement over AI training

54 pointsby kurhanover 1 year ago

9 comments

probably_wrongover 1 year ago
Random thought: my blog is licensed under a Creative Commons license [1] that allows you to use and transform my content as long as you give attribution and distribute your contributions under the same terms.<p>I found the OpenAI bot scraping my blog recently. Assuming they used that data, when will they attribute me?<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;creativecommons.org&#x2F;licenses&#x2F;by-sa&#x2F;4.0&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;creativecommons.org&#x2F;licenses&#x2F;by-sa&#x2F;4.0&#x2F;</a>
评论 #37546966 未加载
评论 #37548090 未加载
评论 #37546914 未加载
评论 #37546447 未加载
评论 #37549339 未加载
评论 #37546510 未加载
评论 #37546913 未加载
评论 #37547141 未加载
评论 #37546383 未加载
mannyvover 1 year ago
All these lawsuits will die. Why?<p>Because people train on corpuses of data all the time, without a license or any attribution.<p>Every piece of text a writer reads is training that writer. Every image an artist sees helps to train that artist. Every sound a musician hears is training that musician.<p>That doesn&#x27;t mean they can&#x27;t exclude their works from training via a license going foreward. But that becomes an enforcement problem.
评论 #37546809 未加载
评论 #37546935 未加载
评论 #37546818 未加载
评论 #37546987 未加载
buildbotover 1 year ago
Do cliff notes of books and plays infringe&#x2F;need a license? If so, that seems like they’d have a possible case. Maybe. If not, well… maybe openAI infringed by not buying their original copy, but not sure that feeding it into a bunch of math is going to be copyright infringement.
评论 #37546019 未加载
yieldcrvover 1 year ago
The fair use argument is quite strong<p>If you dissect the plaintiffs claim they are arbitrarily conflating training and regurgitating<p>Training is using for criticism and comparison purposes, hence fair use<p>And there is no lawsuit against what it regurgitates and the purpose of its output, whether someone asks it to give a list for comparison purposes, or specifically asks it for a story that has a plagiarized result
AlbertCoryover 1 year ago
I&#x27;m miffed. I tried a couple characters from my books, and zilch:<p>===== who is dan markunas<p>ChatGPT I&#x27;m sorry, but I don&#x27;t have any information on a person named Dan Markunas in my database ....<p>who is janet saunders ChatGPT I&#x27;m sorry, but I don&#x27;t have any specific information about a person named Janet Saunders in my database,<p>===========
评论 #37546541 未加载
mistrial9over 1 year ago
this is a great lawsuit! if you read the complaint, they catch OpenAI dead-to-rights .. asking about plot details with names from the books, asking to write a paragraph in the style of the author in that book, and a diversity of authors that shows social awareness.. great support for this from California
评论 #37547803 未加载
tsegratisover 1 year ago
I&#x27;m waiting for the day OpenAI sues humans for infringement of it&#x27;s prompt output
rackedover 1 year ago
It&#x27;s akin to suing a person for memorizing things from a book. Don&#x27;t complain, go write something.
RecycledEleover 1 year ago
Is there a list of the critters suing AI companies so I can boycott them?
评论 #37550449 未加载