TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Starlink quietly lost over $250M in burned satellites this summer

76 pointsby max_hammerover 1 year ago

10 comments

modelessover 1 year ago
Lost 200 but launched 345, almost all of which are the latest upgraded version. The satellites are designed to last 5 years (the lifetime is limited by propellant because of atmospheric drag at their low altitude) and the first batches were launched 4 years ago now. As the constellation matures they will be de-orbiting satellites about as fast as they launch them.<p>Seems to me like the long term viability of Starlink (if it&#x27;s not already profitable) will be assured if Starship meets its goals. They&#x27;ll be able to launch way more satellites at once, for less per launch, and with faster turnaround.
评论 #37553237 未加载
评论 #37553502 未加载
评论 #37553213 未加载
评论 #37635445 未加载
评论 #37553564 未加载
npuntover 1 year ago
Lost $250M <i>using the advertised launch price of $67M for Falcon 9</i>, which of course is way higher than what it actually costs SpaceX.
评论 #37553104 未加载
评论 #37553029 未加载
评论 #37553007 未加载
评论 #37553012 未加载
codegladiatorover 1 year ago
So we have reached that stage of Universal Paperclips
评论 #37553272 未加载
helsinkiandrewover 1 year ago
That&#x27;s about a 4.4% loss (200 of 4500 satelites which are expected to have a life of 5 years), and the internal cost to Starlink of a new launch is probably far less than the $67 million &#x27;retail&#x27; cost of a SpaceX launch.
vardumpover 1 year ago
I think they&#x27;re prepared to lose satellites, that&#x27;s the nature of large swarms.<p>Some losses might be intentional for safety after damage or low propellant. They really can&#x27;t afford to put any debris on their orbits.
评论 #37553025 未加载
eunosover 1 year ago
Speaking of Starlink, what piqued my interest is that Huawei Mate 60 incorporated satellite call module without being bulky. It is not yet able to do data transfer but in case they can, isnt that practically a portable starlink equivalent?
评论 #37553387 未加载
评论 #37553360 未加载
评论 #37553332 未加载
grousewayover 1 year ago
Is this because they are making a trade-off between surving some amount of solar flare activity vs increasing satellite weight by hardening them to radation?<p>I imagine it&#x27;s preventable since the ISS and other large orbiters stay functional forever.
bagelsover 1 year ago
Is this intentional? Is it just happening for newly launched satellites?
评论 #37552924 未加载
Ekarosover 1 year ago
Going forward what is the expected yearly attrition rate? So how much have they spend a year to keep replacing the natural losses of their satellites?
mlindnerover 1 year ago
It&#x27;s unfortunate that this misinformation is being upvoted on this site. The headline is completely incorrect, as is the statistics they&#x27;re using to base the article on.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;Marco_Langbroek&#x2F;status&#x2F;1705562829225410697" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;Marco_Langbroek&#x2F;status&#x2F;17055628292254106...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;planet4589.org&#x2F;space&#x2F;con&#x2F;star&#x2F;stats.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;planet4589.org&#x2F;space&#x2F;con&#x2F;star&#x2F;stats.html</a><p>There has only ever been 350 starlink satellites that have deorbited, and only 8 within the last two months.