OK, I think I can summarize the author's argument now:<p>* Facebook had a strategy to cement its role as the center of online life in Myanmar and it worked<p>* Facebook did not properly invest in Burmese [1] language content moderation and there was a proliferation of racist / genocidal memes [2]<p>* A lot of people tried to warn Facebook about the content moderation problem but Facebook did not adequately respond<p>* The timing of a terrible, full-blown genocide correlated strongly with Facebook's increased presence in Myanmar<p>* Facebook incentivized sensationalist content, and racist / genocidal content was an effective strategy for people responding to those incentives<p>[1] Not sure if I have the correct name for the language(s)<p>[2] "memes" in the Dawkins sense