<i>"Finnerty, Edward Francis Finnerty, Ph.D., one-time EC-002."</i><p><i>"There's a collector's item - a double-o-two number!" said Lasher. "I've known several single-o men, but never a double-o. I guess you're the highest classification I ever had friendly words with. If the Pope set up shop in this country, he'd be only one notch up - in the R-numbers of course. He'd be an R-001. I heard somewhere that the number was being held for him, over the objections of Episcopal bishops who want R-001 themselves. Delicate business.</i><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Player_Piano_(novel)" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Player_Piano_(novel)</a>
Д-503, a spacecraft engineer, rated 47-29.<p>The first figure reflecting social status, and the second – social level, reflecting “merits” and “prospects”, respectively.<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_(novel)" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_(novel)</a> (1921)
I suspect the article was written by AI:<p>>Of course, the platform represents an interesting experiment that can lead to new approaches to assessing the social status and standard of living of citizens. However, it is necessary to ensure transparency, data protection and a balance between individual rights and state interests
“We” system will be useful not only for banks, but also for governors, for whom it will be able to classify citizens according to their usefulness to the state.<p>When you reach the obsolete status then what? Also this applies to public authorities?
<a href="https://youtu.be/zGZqnc6_5To?si=BsHSPxDB0-NYp-Rs" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://youtu.be/zGZqnc6_5To?si=BsHSPxDB0-NYp-Rs</a>
Horrendous, but the nice side effect... the more China, Russia, and other totalitarian states double down on these efforts, the easier it is to argue against them in the West.