TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

MyQ's horrible take on open access to their devices

58 pointsby daviesgeekover 1 year ago

10 comments

glasssover 1 year ago
I know someone who worked on MyQ a few years ago. Management was focused on money and then the company got bought by Blackstone. So despite all of the PO's and developers desperately wanting to build a good product that just opens up people's doors, they were forced to put in a ton of dark patterns and implement dumb strategies.
thusjustinover 1 year ago
Firstly, I completely agree with the sentiment in this post. I’m one of the many affected by this, and it’s annoying. Secondly, I have a hunch that there is a lawyer on the MyQ side that said that allowing customers to control their doors via api will open MyQ to liability. It’s an absurd argument since, well, it is a door with a remote control, but I can easily picture someone making that argument. I wish there was a way to ensure open compatibility of devices when they are sold, like an “open access” certification.
评论 #38033589 未加载
评论 #38042546 未加载
noxonover 1 year ago
I built an opener with an ESP8266. Cost five bucks, took a couple hours, no cloud, no drama. Thanks to Home Assistant and Homekit integration, anyone in the household can use it effortlessly.
评论 #38035402 未加载
thebiglebrewskiover 1 year ago
The only reason that I wanted Home Assistant to integrate with MyQ is to close my garage doors after 15 minutes if they were left open. The fact that their app doesn&#x27;t support this out of the box tells you everything you need to know about the quality of their software.<p>Sadly I need MyQ to integrate with my Model 3 though. So I&#x27;ll probably keep it and get ratgdo too (or something similar since my openers are older than Security 2.0) simply so I can close the door if it&#x27;s left open.
评论 #38050094 未加载
sashkover 1 year ago
When my 23 years old garage door opener failed to the point were it wasn&#x27;t repairable, had to pickup new one. All decent ones comes with MyQ. Instead of using MyQ connection, I got extra 883LMW, opened it, soldered two wires to the button and connected it to my existing wifi door opener.
fatnoahover 1 year ago
I was excited to get a door opener that I could open remotely and ended up with a MyQ model. I&#x27;m pretty sure that I managed to successfully control my door once or twice in 5 years. The app could never find one or both openers, the &quot;door open&quot; alerts never worked, and I eventually uninstalled the app and installed a keypad.
thedougdover 1 year ago
I use the Tuya based openers. They’re cheap and pretty good. I bet you could flash with esphome or other firmwares but I haven’t bothered.
nfriedlyover 1 year ago
Agree with this, myQ is such a dumpster fire. It needs to have an the ability to be managed over the local network instead of requiring the garage door and app connect to their server.<p>My very first experience with myQ was figuring out that their IP blocklist provider, brightcloud, blocks anything with the word &quot;proxy&quot; - including the default &quot;it works&quot; page for Nginx Proxy Manager [1]. And they have no way of overriding this to actually provide service if someone turns out to be a legitimate customer.<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;NginxProxyManager&#x2F;nginx-proxy-manager&#x2F;discussions&#x2F;2127#discussioncomment-6326517">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;NginxProxyManager&#x2F;nginx-proxy-manager&#x2F;dis...</a>
Lieneticover 1 year ago
The Meross smart garage door opener works well as an alternative.
评论 #38039321 未加载
zomgover 1 year ago
Thanks for posting this. I was wondering why my garage door stopped working with Home Assistant. Infuriating!