At last, I thought, he's finally moved on from "Transgressing the Boundaries". On page 2:<p><i>In my parody article, “Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative
Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity” (Sokal 1996), I wrote ...</i><p>Oh well.
Which part of this is controversial?<p>> The Journal of Controversial Ideas offers a forum for careful, rigorous, unpolemical discussion of issues that are widely considered controversial<p>In section 8 he suggests the ideas he's critiquing are "controversial" which in this context you'd assume would be a good thing, but apparently not?
Sadly, Sokal's legacy has been smeared by the later culture warriors, and I am not sure whether he is just fueling the flames with this piece by attacking some random junior scholar, citing altmetric garbage as a justification along the way.