I recently cancelled copilot (only used the chat) in favor of aider[0] and chatgpt vscode extension[1]. I really didn’t find myself using it much and paying for usage via openai api seems a bit more reasonable for my use case.<p>Side note… I also tried continue.dev vscode extension[2] but could not get it to work reliably.<p>[0]: <a href="https://aider.chat/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://aider.chat/</a>
[1]: <a href="https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=feiskyer.chatgpt-copilot" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=feiskyer...</a>
[2]: <a href="https://continue.dev/">https://continue.dev/</a>
> Many ideas and bugs begin in a GitHub issue. By combining the details of the issue with the knowledge of the codebase and the reasoning capabilities of GPT-4, our research team at GitHub Next has developed an AI-powered bridge to help every developer scale the barrier of putting an idea into code<p>It's interesting to see how careful they are to put developers first in the way they describe use of the products. To me this is a step closer to replacing developers with PMs.
> Bringing Copilot Chat to JetBrains<p>Yay. I got into the copilot x labs beta but using VS code is a nonstarter. I love my JetBrains IDEs and refuse to use anything else.
Am I correct that only the enterprise version ($40/mo) will have the ability to use your GH repos as context for the chat? If so that kind of sucks.<p>I’d almost consider paying for it for my personal repos which contains my side business but it’s a stretch.
Does this mean that the current copilot offering is not GPT4?<p>I read the announcement and really can't tell what is supposed to be different about this than the current VS Code copilot extension.<p>Is it just expanded availability to other services like GitHub?