The document itself: <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/Code-of-Conduct-for-Justices_November_13_2023.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/Code-of-Conduct-for-Justi...</a><p>>For the most part these rules and
principles are not new: The Court has long had the
equivalent of common law ethics rules, that is, a body of rules
derived from a variety of sources, including statutory
provisions, the code that applies to other members of the
federal judiciary, ethics advisory opinions issued by the
Judicial Conference Committee on Codes of Conduct, and
historic practice. The absence of a Code, however, has led
in recent years to the misunderstanding that the Justices of
this Court, unlike all other jurists in this country, regard
themselves as unrestricted by any ethics rules. To dispel
this misunderstanding, we are issuing this Code, which
largely represents a codification of principles that we have
long regarded as governing our conduct.<p>----<p>From a quick scan, I think the inclusion of spouses in some of the suggestions for recusal are probably among the most notable. Also:<p>>A Justice may attend a “fundraising event” of law-
related or other nonprofit organizations, but a
Justice should not knowingly be a speaker, a guest
of honor, or featured on the program of such event.
In general, an event is a “fundraising event” if
proceeds from the event exceed its costs or if
donations are solicited in connection with the event.<p>Is maybe interesting, especially re: Federalist Society and Leonard Leo.<p>At any rate, it says "should" and "may" rather than "must" so YMMV.