TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Code not physical property

42 pointsby shadesandcolourabout 13 years ago

5 comments

shadesandcolourabout 13 years ago
So if our code isn't a physical thing and can't be stolen, can we say the same thing for other digital files, like movies and music?
评论 #3830335 未加载
评论 #3830179 未加载
评论 #3830255 未加载
评论 #3830354 未加载
Maxiousabout 13 years ago
Interesting that they did agree that digital money (wire transfers) is property. So one set of bits is theft but another set isn't.
评论 #3831451 未加载
评论 #3832701 未加载
ChuckMcMabout 13 years ago
Now <i>that</i> is an interesting monkey in the wrench. A 2nd Circuit opinion that allows that<p><i>"He (the defendant) argues that:<p>[1] the source code was not a “stolen” “good” within the meaning of the NSPA, and<p>[2] the source code was not “related to or included in a product that is produced for or placed in interstate or foreign commerce” within the meaning of the EEA.<p>The judgement of the district court is reversed."</i><p>Which narrows the opinion to the definitions in the NSPA and EEA but I think some creative lawyering should be able to get this into things like code to compress images for example.<p>It will be interesting to see if anyone can use this as leverage in the ongoing copyright/patent/IP discussion.
vishaldpatelabout 13 years ago
It would be lovely to read an IP lawyer's opinion on this story's implications.<p>Does this mean that a programmer working at a firm can walk away with code without breaking any laws?
评论 #3830299 未加载
Radzellabout 13 years ago
I like that he got off, but does that means for the hackers that took googles code. What happens to all patents on software.