TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

YouTube Copyright ID Scammers Must Pay Artists $3.3M Restitution

218 pointsby gslinover 1 year ago

9 comments

acidburnNSAover 1 year ago
I've been getting 1960s public domain Atomic Energy Commission films scanned from 16mm reels at the National Archives and posting on YouTube. I noticed they were running a lot of ads even though I had monetization off. Turns out, each one got a few copyright claims from people who apparently release "remastered" old music in the 2010s. I got annoyed and disputed them all and as of yesterday the claims have all been released. What a pain.
评论 #38305062 未加载
评论 #38306455 未加载
评论 #38308530 未加载
评论 #38307571 未加载
评论 #38306739 未加载
AugustoCASover 1 year ago
I only skimmed through the article, but if I understood correctly the scammers made $23m, now have to repay $3.3m (which probably will never happen) and some of their assets were taken. They were given 4 and 6 year prison sentences (which might be cut short for good conduct I assume).<p>So in 3 years these blokes come out, with probably ~5m-10m stashed away? Not a bad ROI :(.
评论 #38303424 未加载
评论 #38306359 未加载
评论 #38304789 未加载
评论 #38306793 未加载
评论 #38307982 未加载
评论 #38308759 未加载
good8675309over 1 year ago
Finally, some justice in the Wild West of YouTube copyright claims. Scammers forced to cough up $3.3M is a drop in the ocean compared to the havoc they&#x27;ve wreaked, but it&#x27;s a start. Let&#x27;s hope this sets a precedent and not just a one-off feel-good headline. Next step: overhaul the entire copyright ID system so genuine creators don&#x27;t have to jump through hoops to prove they own their own work. It should be way harder to file copyright claims and actually take down content from Youtube, the amount of power these &quot;copyright holders&quot; have is crazy.
评论 #38304783 未加载
gosub100over 1 year ago
Why doesn&#x27;t Google have to pay the artists the full amount since the original payments were made to the wrong person?
评论 #38305123 未加载
ikekkdcjkfkeover 1 year ago
Not that i know how Content ID works, but it should red flag new content id signatures that already exists on youtube..
评论 #38304573 未加载
diebillionairesover 1 year ago
So, they made 24M but had to pay 3M and serve 70 months.. Idk but that doesn&#x27;t sound half bad.
评论 #38307219 未加载
评论 #38308822 未加载
Joel_Mckayover 1 year ago
The whole industry is a con, and only the music&#x2F;performance is real.<p>Disputes about Fiscal and Promotional gains from content duplication go back to before Johannes Gutenberg. Up till very recently, there was a clear distinction between the act of duplication for profit, and monetizing peoples gaze.<p>Indeed, the copyright industry has had a windfall due to successful lobbying, and no one dares mess with Disney. The criminals were just late to the Securitization of pop-culture.<p>The main tragedy is most companies no longer respect the mediums or content quality. Ripping off Mark Hamill with ML technology CGI was just the final insult to the profession, and a ludicrous perversion of Copyright law.<p>Have a wonderful day =)
j16sdizover 1 year ago
Misleading title. Pay RIAA $3.3 millions.<p>Not paying artists.
评论 #38306515 未加载
评论 #38308645 未加载
评论 #38306504 未加载
dun44over 1 year ago
Sadly this isn’t about how the „rightful” IP owners use DMCA to scam YouTubers, only about some small fish.