This is incredible news!<p>EVs provide the sweetest kind of demand for a grid, they are parked 23 hours a day, can charge whenever power is free and less than free. Power prices go negative 200 million times/year[1]. Batteries, Solar and Wind and still in the early stages, as volume grows, both will get a lot cheaper. Batteries add the much needed gigantic-distributed-storage-reservoir, soaking up all the excess production that is currently wasted.<p>An insightful comment from a HNer (don't remember who), if there is excess production we have to either move it across time or across space. Across space requires building transmission lines (costly, takes a decade). Across time is easy, we just need more EVs, everywhere.<p><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:3-Learning-curves-for-electricity-prices.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:3-Learning-curves-for-e...</a><p>(2019 article) “Batteries will fall much faster than you are forecasting.” The key determinant of our forecast is the relationship between price and volume. From the observed historical values, we calculate a learning rate of around 18%. This means that for every doubling of cumulative volume, we observe an 18% reduction in price. Based on this observation, and our battery demand forecast, we expect the price of an average battery pack to be around $94/kWh by 2024 and $62/kWh by 2030: <a href="https://about.bnef.com/blog/behind-scenes-take-lithium-ion-battery-prices" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://about.bnef.com/blog/behind-scenes-take-lithium-ion-b...</a><p>Learning rate for Solar is 20%. According to this article (<a href="https://ourworldindata.org/learning-curve">https://ourworldindata.org/learning-curve</a>), the price declined from $106 to $0.38 per watt in these four decades. A decline of 99.6%. It looks like modules are a lot more cheaper, its now $0.14 per watt for TOPcon(28% efficiency) and $0.12 per watt for PERC (24% efficiency).<p>A common critique that comes up is, we don't have electricity for all the EVs. This is nonsense.<p>(1) Renewable energy is currently curtailed. A lot of production is wasted, because there is no demand at that time. EVs absorb all that.<p>(2) See the calculations here: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35845334">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35845334</a><p>(3) Electricity is used heavily in fossil fuel and oil production. We simply shift it to EVs. No additional demand.<p>(4) Right now, everyone's energy is fragmented: natural gas for cooking, water heating, boiler for heating, gas for cars and electricity. When people switch to EVs, a lot of them switch to solar, consolidating all energy, saving ~$1000/month. And also lowering consumption from the grid.<p>(5) We somehow found a ton of electricity everywhere for bitcoin, 127 TWh. We can definitely find electricity for EVs.<p>But, more importantly, EVs can replace natural gas peaker plants (the costliest part of electricity) and make some money! Powerwall owners are making $150/day: <a href="https://electrek.co/2023/07/05/tesla-electric-customers-report-making-150-day/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://electrek.co/2023/07/05/tesla-electric-customers-repo...</a>. When virtual power plants start popping up, there will be a huge rush to buy EVs. A ton of people are buying homes for 500K+ to put them up on airbnb and they barely make 100/day. Owning an EV (replacing your existing ICE) and make $100+ per day just by opting in to participate in a VPP is the very definition of passive income.<p>[1]<a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-30/trapped-renewable-energy-sends-us-power-prices-below-zero?embedded-checkout=true" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-30/trapped-r...</a>