Why is this article 85% about some dissertation, and basically nothing about the antisemitism in Harvard? First that horrible letter at the start of the war (basically blaming Israel for Hamas killing women and children), and then her testimony?<p>I'd like to hear why people thought she should stay after her poor handling of both events, but the article simply doesn't talk about it.
Isn't there a lot more controversy surrounding this individual that is not touched upon in this article? Didn't this person cover up fraudulent studies by another professor and for someone associated with Epstein?