TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ski resorts battle for a future as snow declines in climate crisis

3 pointsby damethosover 1 year ago

1 comment

syndicatedjellyover 1 year ago
Speaking as someone who&#x27;s lived in Denver for 6 years - my highly unpopular opinion is that skiing sucks.<p>People who head up for a grand ski holiday:<p>- Create obscene amounts of traffic - Suck at skiing on the mountain (and create hazards for people who know how to ski) - Are overwhelmingly wealthy (another example of wealthy people destroying nature, up there with excessive air travel)<p>Expensive ski resorts:<p>- Drive up the cost of living for everyone in the area, not all of whom are rich enough to not care about costs - Destroy nature, both in physical footprint and energy needed to operate lifts, snowcats, and all the surrounding infrastructure - Are a way to keep poor people out of public lands - Are ugly af (my opinion)<p>Personally, I&#x27;ve stopped skiing because it:<p>- Requires driving up treacherous, icy roads, often in the dark, for multiple hours - while in rush hour traffic - Is no longer within my risk-tolerance - Is not fun to navigate thousands of tourists who don&#x27;t know how to ski, as well as worry about a maniac flying by at 70 mph and nearly clipping me - Is an exhausting way to spend a weekend (or weekday that I take off)<p>&quot;What about the poor ski bums?&quot; - find a new hobby. Being poor so you can go skiing every day is a lifestyle choice, not a fact of nature. The ski community contributes nothing of interest to our culture other than stupid catch phrases and music videos of them backflipping for the thousandth time.<p>&#x2F;endrant