web 1.0 was extremely decentralized. And now that everyone has fast connections everyone can easily host web 1.0 sites by installing nginx and putting html and files in directories and forwarding port 80 from their router. It's extremely low risk, no maintaince, low resource usage, and completely distributed. And it's okay if you shut down your computer and the webserver for days or weeks. Being up all the time is only a commercial requirement.<p>I think a real 'web0' like they're talking would be re-implementing Opera's good idea of integrating a working webserver that started up when you started your browser. Opera operated as a proxy for those hosted websites but that need not be the case.
<i>> web0 is the decentralised web.</i><p>As opposed to which "centralized" web?<p>Also why is the website called small-web.org and not decentralized-web.org? Decentralized and small are two different things...
These personal website directories are starting to pile up. Not a bad thing, but is there anything about this that couldn't be described as "personal website havers"?
"web0 is web3 without all the corporate right-libertarian Silicon Valley bullshit."<p>So, building normal small websites like we've always done? I'm honestly struggling to see what's going on here other than a couple of devs blowing off political steam. The Kitten project [0] looks cool, but it's basically any small client-side stack unless I'm missing a really crucial piece.<p>[0] <a href="https://codeberg.org/kitten/app" rel="nofollow">https://codeberg.org/kitten/app</a>