related :<p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38645523">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38645523</a><p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38744050">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38744050</a><p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38741160">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38741160</a><p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38847523">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38847523</a><p>Most are flagged. This one will probably be next if popular. Dang did explain it in the last one, and I respect his position.
Blog Post: <a href="https://blog.paulbiggar.com/i-cant-sleep/" rel="nofollow">https://blog.paulbiggar.com/i-cant-sleep/</a><p>Jim Rose, ceo of CircleCI, responded by pointing out on social media that “Paul does not speak on behalf of” the San Francisco-based company, which he declared was “committed to our customers in Israel and around the world”. Soon afterwards, however, Rose posted: “Effective December 22, Paul Biggar is no longer a director at CircleCI. We thank him for his contributions on the board and wish him the best for what’s next.”
It is shocking to me that the terms "genocide", "apartheid", and "terrorism" are seen by neutral parties as any way inaccurate in the Palestinian context. Sure anyone can argue these are inflammatory or choose not to use the terms personally, but they are indisputably semantically accurate terms.