TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Opera Confirms WebKit Prefix Usage

33 pointsby broddabout 13 years ago

7 comments

mkmcdonaldabout 13 years ago
Here's a better idea, developers: stop using vendor prefixes. Use the W3C-defined property only. If it isn't standardized yet (i.e. doesn't work), then don't use it.<p>Stop opening your Christmas presents at Easter.<p>(sorry; typed from a mobile device)
评论 #3903298 未加载
评论 #3902997 未加载
评论 #3905865 未加载
评论 #3903010 未加载
driaxabout 13 years ago
I've always thought that this didn't seems so bad idea. We use vendor prefixes so specific vendor errors and omissions doesn't become a property of the released standard.<p>An alternative to vendor prefix could have been draft prefixes instead. So for example, Firefox could say that we have partial implemented `shadow-box` draft 1, so we call it `-d1-shadow-box`. If Firefox had a number of omissions they could instead call it `-ff1-shadow-box`. If an later browser supported shadow-box exactly as Firefox did with the same omisisons, they could simply adopt `-ff1-shadow-box`, which then most likely would later become the standard.
评论 #3902953 未加载
guard-of-terraabout 13 years ago
Prefixes do not make sense on 2012 since any browser updates itself every few months.<p>Therefore it makes zero sense to not support every css property whose meaning you understand in the next three months (the lifecycle), and in the next version you can correct it if it deviates.
评论 #3902965 未加载
makecheckabout 13 years ago
If laziness got browsers into the vendor prefix mess, laziness could get them out; the way to do that is to build good developer tools.<p>For example, a tool could scan CSS files and compare usage of vendor prefixes against the current state of cross-browser support for "better" alternatives. Perhaps you see warnings like "property 'webkit-xyz' can be replaced by 'xyz', which has been supported by the top 4 browsers since 2006".
评论 #3902960 未加载
luminariousabout 13 years ago
I wonder how this will affect those who have started using javascript aids like <a href="http://leaverou.github.com/prefixfree/" rel="nofollow">http://leaverou.github.com/prefixfree/</a><p>At this point there are enough prefixes to make manually adding each more than a bit pointless.
Tomis02about 13 years ago
WebKit. Killing the open web since 1998.
评论 #3903110 未加载
评论 #3902909 未加载
tomjen3about 13 years ago
In a world that has both Chrome and Firefox, there is no reason to use another browser. They are both open source and available on all PC platforms.<p>Opera needs to stop accusing us of being lazy, and to die. They had their attempt and they blew it. Their existens only hinders the progress of the web.
评论 #3903005 未加载
评论 #3903114 未加载
评论 #3902975 未加载
评论 #3902995 未加载