TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ubuntu Generic vs. Low-Latency Linux Kernel Benchmarks for HPC and Desktop

26 pointsby scnsover 1 year ago

4 comments

techbro92over 1 year ago
I skimmed through the tests in the benchmark and it seems like they’re testing based on throughput and I didn’t see any tests specifically to measure latency. It would have been really useful to see that.
评论 #39213409 未加载
a-french-anonover 1 year ago
Was discussed before these (mostly throughput) benchmarks in <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=39173229">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=39173229</a>
m463over 1 year ago
&gt; <i>Most of the differences were within the Stress-NG kernel micro-benchmarks, which is to be expected.</i><p>&quot;to be expected&quot; with no explanation.<p>What makes this benchmark perform so poorly with the rt kernel?
charcircuitover 1 year ago
If the system could detect when low latency is important they could get away with a single kernel. Or even simply enable low latency by default for the desktop version of ubuntu.
评论 #39213075 未加载
评论 #39213744 未加载
评论 #39213338 未加载