<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/02/opinion/nocera-how-punch-protected-the-times.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/02/opinion/nocera-how-punch-...</a><p>A family committed to journalism. What is Zuckerberg committed to. Building bunkers in Kauai.
> Thanks to Facebook’s intentional corporate structure, he controls the voting shares and the board and can never be expunged in any kind of democratic way for bad management. Mark Zuckerberg cannot be fired.<p>The NYT has the same corporate structure, with the Sulzbergers controlling the voting shares. It's curious that the author fails to make this connection, in an essay about tech and the media, about the kind of tech that obliterated the media, that gained the same kind of power, with the same structures. Maybe Facebook and the NYT have the same corporate structure for the same reason? Maybe they'd be considered less trustworthy if their policies were up to the highest bidder?