The impact on the energy market always seems a tad misstated in these articles. Datacenters are often funded through corporate power purchase agreements, committing them to purchasing power directly from the generator over periods of multiple years. Those CPPAs are often tied to the development of new renewable energy generation (ex: <a href="https://www.matheson.com/insights/detail/matheson-advises-brookfield-renewable-on-facebook-corporate-ppa" rel="nofollow">https://www.matheson.com/insights/detail/matheson-advises-br...</a>). Now, that still puts pressure on the grid for transmission, raises the marginal cost of renewable energy, and in cases where the generator cannot meet demand, presumably increases demand on other generation sources. But it makes the “40% of energy being used by DCs” stat seem a little misleading - a reasonable amount of generation exists because of these DCs.<p>(I work for Meta, who’s Clonee datacenter is mentioned in this article)
I dont really get the point this article is trying to make. It pulls all sorts of unrelated information in it like the Irish civil war and the poverty in the past, but what's the point really?<p>The datacenters don't offer Ireland much, they hardly provide much employment and they use a lot of electricity. But they have to be somewhere. Ireland is a pretty scarcely populated country with low temperatures as the article mentions so it makes sense to have them there.<p>In terms of its reliance on the tech sector Ireland has much bigger problems like a "privacy regulator" that's nothing more than a string puppet for big tech.