TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Chlormequat in food and urine from adults in the United States from 2017 to 2023

92 pointsby spekcularover 1 year ago

12 comments

JohnMakinover 1 year ago
You have to scroll an absurdly long time to find it but this is the key sentence:<p>&gt; Current chlormequat concentrations in urine from this study and others suggest that individual sample donors were exposed to chlormequat at levels several orders of magnitude below the reference dose (RfD) published by the U.S. EPA (0.05 mg&#x2F;kg bw&#x2F;day) and the acceptable daily intake (ADI) value published by the European Food Safety Authority (0.04 mg&#x2F;kg bw&#x2F;day).<p>The levels reported in this study are so negligible but it gets a lot more clicks on your study if you present this data as &quot;chlormequat was detectable in X% of samples.&quot; Statistically significant but they don&#x27;t mention the concentration at all in the abstract, which is just as an important finding.
评论 #39385197 未加载
suddenclarityover 1 year ago
&gt; Compared to these previous studies in Europe, the median levels measured in our study of U.S. samples from 2017 to 2022 were lower, while the median level in 2023 samples were comparable to samples from Sweden, and lower than UK samples<p>&gt; Current chlormequat concentrations in urine from this study and others suggest that individual sample donors were exposed to chlormequat at levels several orders of magnitude below the reference dose (RfD) published by the U.S. EPA (0.05 mg&#x2F;kg bw&#x2F;day) and the acceptable daily intake (ADI) value published by the European Food Safety Authority (0.04 mg&#x2F;kg bw&#x2F;day).<p>My two takeaways. The main source in the US seems to be from import and it&#x27;s several magnitudes lower than acceptable daily intake. This might obviously change, but still reasonable to keep in mind.
NegativeLatencyover 1 year ago
Well this is making me think about switching to organic only grains. Feels like a bit of a regulatory failure.
评论 #39384690 未加载
评论 #39384757 未加载
评论 #39385059 未加载
评论 #39384786 未加载
评论 #39384774 未加载
vilicityabout 1 year ago
I don&#x27;t understand why it still seems to be a huge secret.They&#x27;ve genetically modified seeds so that home gardening of fruits and veggies seeds cannot be used to plant future gardens.They tell us that we&#x27;re using to many antibiotics,yet antibiotics are given to cows,pigs,chickens,the very meats we consume.Maybe that&#x27;s why antibiotics are being said to not work and not human consumption.The very living conditions of meat consumption is also tainted. Meats are being grown in labs stating a shortage of food yet they are using chemicals like the ones listed here to reduce the foods we need. They recently raised the retirement age to 70 years old. They are trying to use chemicals which cause infertility in humans (read the article here keyword infertile). It&#x27;s all about controlling population, people not living to retire,yet using them as lab rats while they are on this side of the dirt.Plausable deniability be dammed .
评论 #39489215 未加载
photochemsynover 1 year ago
Body burning screening for toxic chemical accumulation should be a regular part of every American&#x27;s yearly physical checkup with their doctor - which itself is an increasingly rare phenomenon, many people only go to doctors and hospitals after getting very sick as they can&#x27;t afford to have a regular doctor or preventative health program. A body burden program would lead to the identification of the most problematic industrial and agricultural chemical products, and so it would be blocked by lobbyists from the fossil fuel, petrochemical, agribusiness, and manufacturing sectors.<p>America has the worst public health care &#x2F; food safety system in the industrialized world, and not even a pandemic that killed over a million American citizens resulted in any political pressure to change the system.
评论 #39385024 未加载
bohover 1 year ago
Excuse me if I’m reading this wrong, but less than 100 urine samples were tracked for any given year?
评论 #39385163 未加载
hscontinuityover 1 year ago
Having little personal knowledge in this area of food growth, harvest and production, then of course any pre-market execution practices for shelf lives or processing; what are the ill effects of exposure specifically relating to birth&#x2F;fetal deficiencies?<p>Perhaps I&#x27;m a bad looker-up but I can&#x27;t find the relative answer (seemingly) in various animal studies linked, outside of noting reproductive issues. Thanks in advance!
throwitaway222over 1 year ago
Normally it&#x27;s the US that is spraying plants with &quot;Definitely Kills Humans TM&quot; but this time I guess it was the EU doing it.
vondurover 1 year ago
According the wikipedia page, Chormequat is not authorized for use in food crops, only ornamental plants. Has that changed?
评论 #39385694 未加载
tfvlrueover 1 year ago
Treat this study with a grain of salt. The Environmental Working Group is essentially a lobbying group for the organic food industry. They tend to stigmatize &quot;conventional&quot; farming in pseudo-scientific ways to make organic food seem better or healthier, when the differences are typically just marketing.<p>More details:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.agdaily.com&#x2F;insights&#x2F;dirty-deception-ewg-dirty-dozen&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.agdaily.com&#x2F;insights&#x2F;dirty-deception-ewg-dirty-d...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;skeptoid.com&#x2F;episodes&#x2F;4623&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;skeptoid.com&#x2F;episodes&#x2F;4623&#x2F;</a>
voakbasdaover 1 year ago
Another reminder that most food produced by industrial processes is poisoning us. News of this chemical’s prevalence may be news, but the general story is not.<p>Yet nothing has changed, nor should anyone expect otherwise. Big Ag achieved regulatory capture and can afford to delay indefinitely (if not outright stop) any meaningful change from happening.
评论 #39384859 未加载
AlliedForcesover 1 year ago
Can Chlormequat cause bladder cancer? I have it and eat Quaker Oats and Cheerios.