It's inevitable. We are in a normalization phase right now. Soon, kids will just shrug at stuff like that, because they will all know it's likely fake and therefore not care much about it.<p>However, I feel really bad for those who has to be the ones to go through the pain of this phase though.
You can do this with software and models off GitHub quite easily. My wife and I tried it, and it inpaints a body that, while seamless and realistic, looks nothing like her own. In fact changing clothes looks much more realistic (you can do that too, with the same software). It’s gotten to the point where 4chan folks are trying to start a trend they call “DignifAI”, and put clothes onto naked pictures of women from OnlyFans and inpaint cute kids in their arms. Would that be called non-consensual dignity, I wonder?
I have to think that soon nobody is going to care, because that’s the only real solution.<p>The law should forbid/punish harassment, and children need to learn not to harass.<p>But the cost of generic-task photo manipulation, like this, is going to zero. We are only one browser “no cloth” plugin away from being able to surf a world of nude people.<p>Most people are going to take this stuff as seriously as someone drawing horns or a mustache on a picture of them.
Maybe we should just all flood the internet with fake pictures/videos of ourselves, faces on top of the most beautiful bodies that can be imagined. This way everyone seeing it will know it’s fake, and start to ignore it. I don’t really see the harm of a nude picture…
AI-generated fake nude photos of girls from Winnipeg school posted online:<p><a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/artificial-intelligence-nude-doctored-photos-students-high-school-winnipeg-1.7060569" rel="nofollow">https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/artificial-intellige...</a>
As the father of a baby girl, the future scares me sometimes.<p>I don’t want the internet to be an over regulated, bureaucratic mess, but the way AI is going, it might just have to be.<p>Deepfakes, voice clones, extremely sophisticated hacks and phishing…it looks scarier than ever.
When we had kids, my partner and I decided that we would never upload their pictures to any social media sites, or any other semi-public sites.<p>It was a good idea, and now it's becoming an even better idea.
The thing is, is this story even true?<p>We know that media outlets want some sort of legislative process that will designate their content as truth (tm), to create a sort of moat from unsanctioned information. To get support for that, you need the stories.<p>This story reads like investigative journalism, but is it really? The journalism seems self-serving. Real, free investigators would research even the 'good guys' (tm) - eg they would have connected zelensky to the Panama papers or whatever other scandals there are.<p>It seems the media only research when it is in their favour, and yet we are meant to think they are appropriate handlers of truth. The chutzpah is quite funny.