TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Earliest forest discovered, scientists say

53 pointsby The-Old-Hackerabout 1 year ago

5 comments

JoeAltmaierabout 1 year ago
Interesting, but on the wobbly side of science.<p>Trees are usually defined to be something very different from cycads and palms. Today if these were growing, they wouldn&#x27;t be called trees, and their cluster not called forests.<p>And second, similarly to how &#x27;there&#x27;s no such thing as a fish&#x27;, it&#x27;s been postulated that there&#x27;s no such thing as a tree. Many different life-forms that we call trees, have no known common ancestor.<p>Make of that what you will.
评论 #39654389 未加载
评论 #39654463 未加载
评论 #39654437 未加载
评论 #39656175 未加载
jmclnxabout 1 year ago
Interesting it was in the UK, I was expecting Australia or Quebec where I think geological finds tend to be much older.
评论 #39653085 未加载
8A51Cabout 1 year ago
Coincidently, they also discovered &#x27;living fossils&#x27; amongst the entertainment acts at Butlins Minehead. Some were said to rival the tree fossils in age.
tuatoruabout 1 year ago
Rugose and squamous.
INTPenisabout 1 year ago
.., scientists say. has to be my favorite suffix to any headline.