This was already posted just yesterday: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39714502">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39714502</a>
The reality is we've known peer-review is leaky, less we forget the Grievance studies affair[0].<p>0: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievance_studies_affair" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievance_studies_affair</a>
So much for the value of peer review.<p>I can still remember only a couple years ago when no one on HN would read your sources because they were "pre-print" and hadn't been peer reviewed