TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Abraham Wald and the airplane diagram with red bullet holes

14 pointsby lwhsiaoabout 1 year ago

3 comments

btillyabout 1 year ago
I&#x27;m pretty sure that I encountered the survivorship bias story before that picture, but that picture is how everyone visualizes it.<p>But from <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;steveblank.com&#x2F;secret-history&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;steveblank.com&#x2F;secret-history&#x2F;</a> I learned that what really helped the planes most was not better armor, it was radar countermeasures that kept the Luftwaffe from being able to target the bomber stream. If you have an hour, I highly recommend that talk. And the blog series that goes with it is brilliant.
评论 #39794226 未加载
评论 #39794781 未加载
mchobbesabout 1 year ago
I want to be clear, up front, that I believe credit should go where credit is due but, ignoring the arrogance of the blog post in its entirety, there are two closely-related things that rub me the wrong way about this. First is the fact that the actual famous image (which is both the image the author uses at the top of their blog post as well as the one found on wikipedia — who, ironically, _do_ indeed give them credit) is not the image this person created. Second is the fact that the author did not even create the original image. As mentioned in the blog post, the original was created by Abraham Wald. So, this person is neither the creator of the original image, nor the creator of the famous image. They simply feel like they haven&#x27;t gotten enough credit for making it famous.
评论 #39794730 未加载
评论 #39794753 未加载
评论 #39795444 未加载
admpabout 1 year ago
Please change the URL to <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;</a>, the cert has expired in 2021.