TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Key Stable Diffusion Researchers Leave Stability AI as Company Flounders

101 pointsby muzzabout 1 year ago

11 comments

blueblistersabout 1 year ago
SD3.0 looks really good and will probably displace a lot of closed image generation models once it&#x27;s out.<p>I don&#x27;t understand why Stability gets so little support from the community. They released the first usable open-source models and their models are the foundation of the most interesting AI-bashing workflows out there - VC funded or otherwise.
评论 #39769464 未加载
评论 #39769367 未加载
评论 #39769984 未加载
评论 #39769422 未加载
Octokiddieabout 1 year ago
I was looking for something about how the company actually made money, but only found this:<p>&gt; It’s a dramatic exodus that comes less than 18 months after Stability’s 2022 fundraise that valued the company at $1 billion. Now, the company is facing a cash crunch, with spending on wages and compute power far outstripping revenue, according to documents seen by Forbes. Bloomberg earlier reported that the company was spending $8 million a month. In November 2023, CEO Emad Mostaque tweeted that the company had generated $1.2 million in revenue in August, and would make $3 million in November. The tweet was later deleted.<p>This sounds a lot like the two-year period leading up to the dot com crash. Insane valuations and no revenue model. Meanwhile those insanely-valued companies bought Sun Microsystems servers like there was no tomorrow. When the games ended, a lot of those insanely-valued companies went to zero and left a massive overhang of Sun hardware in their wake. Sun began its long nosedive not long after that.
skadamatabout 1 year ago
This many people leaving and key investors resigning from the board is definitely interesting. I wonder if there&#x27;s some undisclosed scandal that will break because this is pretty wild.
SV_BubbleTimeabout 1 year ago
Every Forbes article should have the warning that they are not real publication anymore. Everything they publish is written with an intention that you believe an authors opinion as fact.<p>The model for Stability ends in a likely way, they will be swallowed up in a payday. We have recent examples of this.<p>For now, they’re the most open area in a garden of closing gates. And I wish them all the best.
评论 #39771953 未加载
评论 #39769945 未加载
评论 #39770028 未加载
评论 #39769159 未加载
评论 #39768869 未加载
ruleryakabout 1 year ago
Archived non paywall copy of the article: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;iRIlp" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;iRIlp</a>
评论 #39768998 未加载
barapaabout 1 year ago
They should consider selling flounder
uaserussiaabout 1 year ago
How can we help save Stability AI?
brcmthrowawayabout 1 year ago
The open source community should pitch in.. goFundMe
评论 #39768791 未加载
singularity2001about 1 year ago
For my use cases OpenAI&#x27;s DallE is often good enough. No more Discord nonsense.
评论 #39769042 未加载
dreamcompilerabout 1 year ago
Of course the verb they&#x27;re looking for is <i>founders</i>. A flounder is a fish. <i>Founder</i> (as a verb) means &quot;to fail.&quot;
评论 #39769659 未加载
评论 #39769675 未加载
评论 #39770043 未加载
评论 #39769671 未加载
__loamabout 1 year ago
Stability always seemed like a dark horse thanks to the reputation of their founder and their open source business model. I do get some schadenfreude from seeing them like this considering the damage many feel they&#x27;ve done to the art community.<p>E: -4 in 10 minutes. Stay classy hackernews. I hope this company and OpenAI choke on the algorithmic disgorgement when the law catches up.
评论 #39769181 未加载
评论 #39768711 未加载
评论 #39769000 未加载
评论 #39769880 未加载
评论 #39769706 未加载
评论 #39771548 未加载