TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ask HN: Any Good Fuzzer for gRPC?

10 pointsby TheBigRoomXXLabout 1 year ago
I have been using Schemathesis (https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;schemathesis&#x2F;schemathesis) for some time to test REST APIs and I have found it amazing. I love the ways it find unexpected bugs and it really help me have more confidence in my systems.I also love how it integrate directly with pytest but that&#x27;s more of a cherry on the cake.<p>But now I am working with GRPC service I can&#x27;t find anything similar. The few solutions I found are closed source and necessitate to integrate with 3rd party platforms.I found that strange as GRPC as RPC seem perfect for fuzzing.<p>Did I miss a great tool that you use?

2 comments

dmitry_dygaloabout 1 year ago
I am not aware of any tools like that, but eventually, I plan to add support for gRPC fuzzing to Schemathesis. There were already some discussions and it is more or less clear how to move forward. See <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;schemathesis&#x2F;schemathesis&#x2F;discussions&#x2F;1903">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;schemathesis&#x2F;schemathesis&#x2F;discussions&#x2F;190...</a>
评论 #39788837 未加载
Jenssonabout 1 year ago
Have you tried Googles grpc fuzzer? Not sure if the open source version is easy to use, but I used a fuzzer library when I worked at Google so they have good fuzzers themselves, but could potentially be hard to build or run or adapt to your codebase.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;google&#x2F;oss-fuzz&#x2F;blob&#x2F;master&#x2F;projects&#x2F;grpc&#x2F;build.sh">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;google&#x2F;oss-fuzz&#x2F;blob&#x2F;master&#x2F;projects&#x2F;grpc...</a>
评论 #39794067 未加载