TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Grafana Labs Observability Survey 2024

20 pointsby shaharglabout 1 year ago

4 comments

jasonjmcgheeabout 1 year ago
Do you think 91% of people using grafana is an accurate figure? Seems very high.
评论 #39828044 未加载
评论 #39828074 未加载
评论 #39828077 未加载
评论 #39827978 未加载
评论 #39828244 未加载
评论 #39828607 未加载
nemo44xabout 1 year ago
This is just a piece of marketing material - it's the survey of ~300 Grafana customers. Congrats to Grafana for getting their advertisement posted to this Website.
palijerabout 1 year ago
&gt;About the respondents and methodology. This year, 306 people participated in the Grafana Labs Observability Survey. We did not contract an outside agency to solicit responses. Instead, we reached out to our community to participate, through our website, social media, and at various Grafana Labs and OSS events.<p>This should be right at the top as it indicates a substantial bias in the data.<p>Calling this survey &quot;Key findings and analysis on the state of observability&quot; is disingenuous at best with that methodology. If this team realistically thinks this small sample size and narrow grouping gives an accurate analysis of the big picture, I would be hesitant about any analysis their product can provide.
评论 #39828487 未加载
tmd83about 1 year ago
There seems to be newer players both open source and commercial now. But a lot of the focus seems in metric and specially distributed traces. Does anyone in the open source do code level profiling (cpu, allocation, locks etc.) preferably sampling profiler (including Java)?<p>I have only really found pyroscope.
评论 #39828883 未加载