Hi guys, I'm one of CSS Hat devs and I'd like to thank you for your interest and show a little bit more:<p>This is the output of current version of CSS Hat:
<a href="http://jsfiddle.net/tomaskafka/ZXgqN/" rel="nofollow">http://jsfiddle.net/tomaskafka/ZXgqN/</a>
Fireworks CS6 has something related to this. If you select an object in Fireworks, you can get the CSS which will build the shape, gradients, curved borders, etc.<p><a href="http://layersmagazine.com/new-css3-support-in-dreamweaver-cs6.html" rel="nofollow">http://layersmagazine.com/new-css3-support-in-dreamweaver-cs...</a>
I was <i>just</i> talking about this with colleagues. If some piece of photo manipulation software centered its features for the web developer and actually outputted the CSS for shadows, blend modes, etc. I am sure that many would be interested. Photoshop is great, don't get me wrong, but it is shoehorned into being a web development tool. It isn't by nature. Fireworks and tools like it were never well rounded enough. Now we're in an era where CSS can actually do a lot of the stuff Photoshop is capable of.<p>Can't wait to try this out.
This is huge if they can pull it off. I wonder how accurately they can make it happen. Even if they're simply able to position layers exactly the same as in PS, it's already something I would use as being extremely useful. This could virtually allow you to not code in HTML/CSS3 anymore - which is something I really hate to do.<p>So would it output the HTML elements and give you CSS3 code for it? How about <forms> and other elements that aren't just simply <div>'s? Can you make those?
I wonder how many people still use Photoshop to create mocksups first and then move to HTML/CSS.
Ever since CSS3 became popular I create my mockups directly in HTML/CSS3.
From the link:<p>"Photoshop is required to use CSS Hat."<p>From their main site:<p>"CSS Piffle. No more photo editing software for web design!"<p>Eating their own dog food?