So this study seems to be about maximizing the nutrients from sea catches to consumption, suggesting we should eat what we feed the salmon instead of the farmed salmon themselves, but anchovies, herring, and mackerel aren’t on most people’s menu often.<p>This study is not about whether farmed or wild caught fish are better for you.
Original article title: Fish fed to farmed salmon should be part of our diet, too, study suggests<p>Original paper: <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-024-00932-z" rel="nofollow">https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-024-00932-z</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-024-00932-z" rel="nofollow">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-024-00932-z</a><p>Original paper title: Wild fish consumption can balance nutrient retention in farmed fish<p>I would be curious how this compares to land-based meat production where we use 2-40x of food input to meat output. But nobody suggests reorganizing the economy to eat grass.
The title put on here is very misleading, the actual title from the article is “Fish fed to farmed salmon should be part of our diet, too, study suggests”.
I've heard a lot of people say farmed salmon tastes different than wild caught. For me, I've never really noticed a difference aside from maybe the coloring. I've never been able to eat anchovies/mackerel/herring as recommended by the article, any tips?