Just FYI, if you’re going to have a cookie banner, you need the option to reject optional and 3rd party cookies. If you aren’t going to allow people to reject cookies as easily as you allow them to accept cookies, you are not complying with the ePrivacy directive. If you’re not bothered with complying, or you’re saying that all your cookies are strictly necessary (which they aren’t), you might as well do away with the banner. If you’re interested in reading further, see the ICO’s page on the subject.<p><a href="https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/direct-marketing-and-privacy-and-electronic-communications/guide-to-pecr/guidance-on-the-use-of-cookies-and-similar-technologies/what-are-the-rules-on-cookies-and-similar-technologies/" rel="nofollow">https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/direct-marketing-and-pr...</a>
What's needed is something that lets you run your resume through the hiring company's filters, given the job description. Of course, once this scales, all incoming resumes for a given job will look identical and score the same.
We're headed for optimal dystopian hiring.
The sales copy here could use some work.<p>- The majority of the page is wasted on irrelevant quotes and then explanations about irrelevant quotes. AI is all around us theres no need to sell AI.<p>- "Design and Development Choices" This section should be moved to the "about us", anything that isn't about the product shouldn't be on the landing page.<p>- There aren't any actual examples of what the tool does, what it looks like, why i need it.
My friends are working on an AI-based assistant for recruiters.<p>People are using our AI-based tool to find and apply to jobs.<p>[insert spiderman meme]
Seems a bit aggrandized. Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, climate change, app-tier pricing packages.<p>You are very likely providing a thin layer on an LLM which does summarization based on criteria. It would be reasonable if that's either a few-shot approach ($0, one time) or a fine-tuned model ($6 - $9 per million tokens, one time), plus the running costs ($0.0001 - $0.01 per run) for llama2 3-70b or gpt3.5-turbo-instruct.<p>Is there any additional USP, like have you used a data set sourced from hires in specific market sectors to know what parts of a resume really enhance or hurt the chances? A similar study on ATS/real filters would be also be a USP. Or another USP could be that it's super easy to use - drop a resume in, Apple Pay $1, it's done. I'm not seeing a lot of value if I can discuss my resume with ChatGPT and other assistants for free to get a second perspective.<p>Best of luck, of course.