Related links (from merged threads):<p><i>Farewell to HD Atlas</i> <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9EM5_VFlt8" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9EM5_VFlt8</a><p><i>Boston Dynamics retires its legendary humanoid robot</i> <a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/boston-dynamics-atlas-retires" rel="nofollow">https://spectrum.ieee.org/boston-dynamics-atlas-retires</a><p><i>All New Atlas</i> <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29ECwExc-_M" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29ECwExc-_M</a>
As we enter an era of wide scale robotic deployment, we need to think long and hard about what the maintenance bottleneck will look like. We need to advocate now for reliable and open upgrades, replacement parts, service documentation, and diagnostics.<p>Right to repair will be even more important for this technology than autos or general computing.
That first video of the bot standing from the floor and turning towards the camera one joint at a time does something strange to the uncanny valley horror movie part of my brain.
Figure, a new startup, is working on a similar humanoid robot. They just raised $675 million from Jeff Bezos, Nvidia, and Microsoft [1]. Not sure about their chances of succeeding.<p>On the other hand, as a non-American, I admire that the USA is seemingly the only place where people get funding for wonky ideas that sometimes become very successful.<p>1- <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2024/02/29/robot-startup-figure-valued-at-2point6-billion-by-bezos-amazon-nvidia.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.cnbc.com/2024/02/29/robot-startup-figure-valued-...</a>
The progress since the 2015 DARPA challenge (where robots succeeded mostly in falling down) is impressive. Less than a decade!<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0TaYhjpOfo" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0TaYhjpOfo</a><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA_Robotics_Challenge" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA_Robotics_Challenge</a>
Seems like they just posted a video about the new Atlas
<a href="https://youtu.be/29ECwExc-_M" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/29ECwExc-_M</a>
The success of old Atlas was partly due to the compactness and high power of hydraulic actuators. There’s a lot of actuators to pack into a humanoid robot and it takes a lot of power to do backflips.<p>I am betting that this one is less powerful, no backflip.
Does anyone else think the joints seem stiffer than the hydraulic version? The head and torso are receiving a lot of shock forces with each step. That seems like a downgrade from the previous one.<p>It clearly has a much larger range of motion and if it is also stronger as claimed then I can't wait for the acrobatics videos that are surely coming.<p>But I think the most exciting thing is that it has hands from the start. Atlas didn't have hands for most of its existence and so couldn't do much in the way of useful tasks. I think controlling hands is actually much harder than walking or doing backflips. Hopefully Boston Dynamics will be able to make this version useful.
We've come a long way from the 2015 DARPA Challenge, where the robots succeeded only in falling down:<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0TaYhjpOfo" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0TaYhjpOfo</a><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA_Robotics_Challenge" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA_Robotics_Challenge</a>
What's the best way/resource to get an honest/pragmatic view of where things stand with the "robots market" in general and how much and fast things are really progressing?<p>I remember seeing prototypes from Toshiba when I was 10 (20 years ago), and every few months, there is a company releasing an "amazing video." its mother company then spins it off like there's no adequate progress, and so on.
That is a very good-looking robot and no doubt very capable. But did I see correctly that it can just turn it legs 180 degrees to move backwards, as well as it's head? Talk about super-human abilities! Bit creepy though
They also posted a farewell to the previous robot yesterday<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9EM5_VFlt8" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9EM5_VFlt8</a><p>Looking forward to see some more robot parkour/dance
The VCs said "don't be afraid," AI wasn't going to be Skynet. Rather it would a tool that would bring about a utopia of human flourishing.<p>But it was always going to be Skynet.<p>I bet the next version will have teeth.
I'm thinking the humanoid approach to robotics is now a gimmick. In most--if not all--cases, a robot in human form is not necessary at all if the approach is to get work done.
I would love to see how well it does the simple job of sweeping and cleaning floors with a broom and dust pan. This is such a wicked and non-trivial task that it would be a good indicator of overall progress.
> This journey will start with Hyundai<p>Wonder if that includes weapon systems?<p><a href="https://en.hyundai-wia.com/business/defense_business.asp" rel="nofollow">https://en.hyundai-wia.com/business/defense_business.asp</a><p>> With its cutting-edge unmanned and automated weapons systems, Hyundai WIA upgraded the level of defense industry system.
feels incredibly eery. it doesn't move like how my brain expects a humanoid being to move. reminds me of how the EMMI's move in Metroid Dread... especially when it goes from the prone position to standing. maybe its my DNA or i've played enough video games to realize that this thing is probably not my friend and will not end well. uncanny valley vibes.
Are there any Boston Dynamic robots currently in use? Specifically the biped ones, but I'm also interested in the quadrupeds, which they seemed to be pushing for military/search and rescue/packhorse uses.
I am much more excited to see the progress of what Boston Dynamics is doing than by the next iteration of AI Chat.<p>Of course this is not directly comparable, but I think robotics is harder and more less open to brute force approaches.
As usual, science fiction predicted everything exactly the opposite. It was thought that robots would handle hard physical labor while humans would engage in creative work...
But Amnon has a better solution...<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJTf4JhGSsI" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJTf4JhGSsI</a>
I don't know enough about robotics to judge BD's technology or innovations. What I can be sure of is that they have an incredible marketing function.
What I find funny is just like with generative AI, this was under the Google banner first until it got struck with office politics related to Andy Rubin. I still don’t understand why someone else at Google didn’t take it over. They really lost their way a long time ago.
This moves like a real robot. In contrast, the Figure 01 video was clearly a fake one (<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sq1QZB5baNw" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sq1QZB5baNw</a>).
So as robots became more capable and less contained (like current industrial robot arms). What novel tools/techniques there are to stop misbehaving robot?<p>Will casting a net stop robot like this or do you have to somehow dismember it?
I wonder if you could send a robot to the store to buy cigarettes in the UK, or indeed the robot may decide it wants to buy cigarettes.<p>"Sorry we can't sell cigarettes to anyone born after 2009, or robots".
Recently got a tour through boston dynamics, but mostly saw the spot department, the atlas department was off limits. I guess this was the reason then :) very cool
Good, the hydraulic version sucked ass. Jerky, unpredictable power delivery, when it wasn’t broken. Was such a pain to model and design kinematics around.
Funny, just after the all electric Optimus.<p>For sure they have been working on this for a long time.<p>I predict that they will also move toward neural nets for all the vision, control and understanding of the world (like Tesla)
Related:<p>> Billionaire-Fueled Lobbying Group Behind the State Bills to Ban UBI Experiments<p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39549098">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39549098</a>
doesn't it make more sense to have robots like these drive cars? Then any car, even an old clunker, can be a "self-driving car".<p>You could offload the heavy processing to a larger computer in the back seat. Then even the robots get to suffer with backseat drivers :)
<i>I'm recording this, because this could be the last thing I'll ever say</i><p><i>The city I once knew as home is teetering on the edge of radioactive oblivion</i><p><i>A three-hundred thousand degree baptism by nuclear fire</i><p><i>I'm not sorry, we had it coming</i><p><i>A surge of white-hot atonement will be our wake-up call</i><p><i>Hope for our future is now a stillborn dream</i><p><i>The bombs begin to fall and I'm rushing to meet my love</i><p><i>Please, remember me</i><p><i>There is no more</i>
Jesus fuck. I guess the war machine is hungry again so they've fired all the people who made the cute dancing videos and brought in the nightmare engineers.<p>I'm thinking more and more that that "Terminator" was the most accurate of all the sci-fi dystopias.
I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords.<p>Progress in robotics is beginning to look non-linear and it will have only positive impact on the world.<p>Skynet won’t be humanoid terminators. Or even drones. The real threat of AI is if/when it will be applied to the field of virology.
I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords.<p>Progress in robotics is beginning to look non-linear and it will have only positive impact on the world.<p>Skynet won’t be humanoid terminators. Or even drones. The real threat of AI is if/when it will be applied to the field of virology.
A hill I'm willing to die on: bipedal robots are an evolutionary path that machines don't need to go down, we have lovely bearings and wheels that work perfectly with electric motors.<p>Yes obviously there are limitations i.e. stairs and uneven terrain but there are wheeled/tracked solutions for those too<p>Most of these robots will be used in factories that have very nice flat concrete floors
Boston Dynamics: Hey everyone, we're really excited to show you the great progress we are making in our attempts to re-create the Torment Nexus, from the classic cautionary sci-fi novel <i>Don't Create The Torment Nexus</i>.<p>Too many responses: Oh, wow, it's so creepy, just like the book! Lol. Anyway, I'm pretty sure it won't turn out as bad as DCTTN. ;-) Best just get on with my day and mostly forget about it then...<p>(With apologies to Alex Blechman)
Quite scary, but can't hold a candle to this one ;)<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3RIHnK0_NE" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3RIHnK0_NE</a>