Forcing master to main was a good faith exploit

Oh man I remember when GitHub did the switch, for about 2 weeks I couldn’t figure out why my Actions workflows weren’t running on a new repo. I had copy/pasted the workflows from another repo and they were targeting the “master” branch but the new repo was using “main”.

I love these ridiculous articles that this guy writes as if he is telling very important things.

Sorry, what's the exploit here? What harm was done to the author?

Language evolve. You don't seem to. Grow up.

Completely sane take on a hugely impactful threat to our current way of life. I would expect nothing less from DHH.

That list is baffling, and I still think Master should have been renamed to Trunk instead.<p>The me of a couple of years ago would probably have made some snarky comment about how DHH is complaining too much about some random list some one made and nobody uses but the last couple of years have shown me how quickly the turbo-woke (not to be confused with regular wokes) can turn fringe standards into mandatory guidelines.<p>I don&#x27;t think anyone will ever get fired or reprimanded for using black list but you can&#x27;t say never anymore.