the limited feedback from <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=siumauricio">https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=siumauricio</a> here and the stonewall response to the, very serious, license issue discussion on github is very concerning.<p>this has every look of a potentially talented developer that seriously misunderstands the legalities and role of open-source. there's probably a way to do what they intend, but this ain't it. and you don't make "open-source" but say "mine! mine! you can't change it/use it".<p>does this violate any github policy? certainly the apache foundation should have a word.
also see: <a href="https://github.com/Dokploy/dokploy/issues/82">https://github.com/Dokploy/dokploy/issues/82</a>
some discussion about the licensing situation from couple days ago: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40195480">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40195480</a><p>oh, and it was flagged. probably for self-promotion. of course.