The researchers claimed the biopsies were low-risk, but the FDA found this was a "false justification" to obtain patient consent.<p>Super important that doctors discuss the risks, even the rare ones, when severe, with patients before doing a procedure/jabbing them with something/putting them on a pharmaceutical
We will look on the notions and practices of medical care in the present with as much mirth as the bloodletters, plague doctors, and humor examiners of the past have provided us.
Since this is so effectively paywalled, it's probably worthwhile to note that much of the story explained here in this tweet thread: <a href="https://twitter.com/KatherineEban/status/1785740414420422819" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/KatherineEban/status/1785740414420422819</a>
Without being able to see through the paywall, its hard to know whether the "false justification" was a technicality or something serious and nefarious.
> at a Mount Sinai medical facility in midtown Manhattan<p>Not the actual mountain mind you, there you'd probably be diagnosed with an acute case of Shahed drone instead.