TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

What Emacs got right, or how modern apps were more like 50 year old text editor

31 pointsby asicsp11 months ago

8 comments

superkuh11 months ago
We're getting to the point where browsers are worthy of the decades old criticism Emacs has received. They have become an OS with many fine features - simply lacking a good web browser.
hollerith11 months ago
&gt;“Why are windows called frames, and tabs called windows?”<p>Windows are called frames in Emacs, yes, but it is <i>panes</i>, not tabs, that are called windows. Tabs are called buffers. (More precisely, the closest analog to a browser tab is an Emacs buffer, and a tab in VSCode is an almost-perfect analog to a buffer in Emacs.)
评论 #40700849 未加载
jmclnx11 months ago
&gt;Scripting Emacs in small ways is really easy and really useful<p>While I agree, for some reason I have a hard time with lisp, will have to revisit again :)<p>But I do use emacs a bit of 50% of the time for development and I find it better than the fancy code environments like M&#x2F;S VScode
hprotagonist11 months ago
everything is a command. If you don&#x27;t like what that command does, monkeypatch it. Congrats, you&#x27;re not a user any more, and never were.
bloopernova11 months ago
I wonder what an alternate timeline would look like if Microsoft has used Emacs as the foundation for Visual Studio Code? Would extensions be easier to write? Would Emacs get a lot more commands rewritten as asynchronous?
drewcoo11 months ago
Without the &quot;I wish,&quot; that title doesn&#x27;t make any sense.
评论 #40690229 未加载
djaouen11 months ago
Honestly, the real meat of Emacs is in buffer&#x2F;split management. If VSCode did those well, then <i>maybe</i> I’d consider switching lol
subjectsigma11 months ago
&gt; I won’t lay this on too thick, but keeping your hands entirely on the keyboard allows for a fluency that is unmatched when you’ve sometimes got to reach for a mouse instead. And there’s additional trust I can place in Emacs knowing that it’s always a matter of finding the way to do something with the keyboard, rather than wondering if it’s possible at all.<p>Here we go again. From <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ux.stackexchange.com&#x2F;questions&#x2F;30682&#x2F;are-there-any-recent-studies-of-the-keyboard-vs-mouse-issue" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ux.stackexchange.com&#x2F;questions&#x2F;30682&#x2F;are-there-any-r...</a> :<p>&gt; We&#x27;ve done a cool $50 million of R &amp; D on the Apple Human Interface. We discovered, among other things, two pertinent facts: — Test subjects consistently report that keyboarding is faster than mousing. - The stopwatch consistently proves mousing is faster than keyboarding.<p>&gt; Previous research comparing methods of issuing commands found that selecting a toolbar item is faster than selecting an item from two menus with either a mouse or keyboard shortcut. Over the course of 90 trials, however, the keyboard method showed the most improvement, nearing the toolbar response time.<p>&gt; In contrast, a more recent study [10] suggests that more complex key sequences do not have such a clear advantage over toolbar selection.<p>TL;DR: Keyboard shortcuts are faster for some actions some of the time, but using the mouse vs keyboard is mostly preference
评论 #40690023 未加载