TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Paramount Erases Mtv.com Archives, Wipes Music, Culture History After 30+ Years

113 pointsby SkyMarshal11 months ago

11 comments

99990000099911 months ago
No worries, at least I&#x27;m subscribed to Paramount Plus.<p>Of course I can watch a classic episode of MTV cribs. Wait what&#x27;s this, they only have the last three seasons!<p>What about the legendary episode where Redman shows off his authentic home!<p>This has to be the biggest tragedy to streaming, I can imagine in 10 years or so BoJack horseman won&#x27;t be palpable to modern audiences. And since Netflix only officially released the first season on DVD, it will effectively become lost media.
评论 #40792527 未加载
评论 #40792621 未加载
DemocracyFTW211 months ago
&gt; Not having print copies of a writer’s work is a big mistake.<p>This is an important thing. People rave about how the internet gives almost everyone immediate access to so many thing, but flip a switch (or stare helplessly as a major CME is hurtling our way) and it&#x27;s all gone for some amount of time or forever.<p>Did the proprietors even consider and try to sell those many hours? If nothing else they could&#x27;ve auctioned files for private use. No-one there to make a quick buck that way?
评论 #40792576 未加载
glimshe11 months ago
That&#x27;s why we need piracy and Reddit data hoarders. Corporations can own our history because of antiquated copyright laws created for sheet music and print books over a century ago.
exe3411 months ago
i don&#x27;t know much about this specific archive, but in my opinion, this kind of action should be considered criminal damage to human cultural heritage. you shouldn&#x27;t have to pay to store it yourself, but you should then have to make sure somebody else gets a chance to pay for a copy.<p>I&#x27;ve seen some YouTube creators delete their past videos when they transition. i understand the desire to distance themselves from their past persona, but again, the content itself doesn&#x27;t belong to just them anymore - they should be able to profit from it if they want, but they shouldn&#x27;t be able to destroy it.
评论 #40792701 未加载
bring_back_sky11 months ago
Oh my goodness. I grew up with these VJs. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;List_of_MTV_video_jockeys" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;List_of_MTV_video_jockeys</a>
joshuaheard11 months ago
You think they could have sold it to someone and transferred the data.
评论 #40792466 未加载
评论 #40792360 未加载
spot198411 months ago
Does anyone know how big the archives were, in terms of storage?
ChrisArchitect11 months ago
[dupe]<p>Discussion: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=40782101">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=40782101</a>
friend_and_foe11 months ago
I don&#x27;t understand the surprise.<p>Corporations are heartless machines. Archival, history, culture, these things are not their priorities. These things are <i>our</i> priorities. If someone else owns your creativity, accept from day 1 that you have no say in what happens to it. Believing otherwise is delusion.
goertzen11 months ago
Obviously dumb, but also can’t say I even knew this existed until now.<p>Was it good ?
jerojero11 months ago
This is why archiving is so important.<p>Imo journalists should be allowed and should (honestly I don&#x27;t know if they are or not, probably not) repost their stories on their own personal websites.<p>You never have any assurance that the parent company that buys you will care about the same things you care about. More often than not they&#x27;re looking for particular segments and everything else is just baggage.
评论 #40791682 未加载
评论 #40792178 未加载
评论 #40791558 未加载
评论 #40791858 未加载