>Our internal security team immediately launched an investigation to help determine what the aim of the attack was,<p>To steal people's crypto?
I'm mostly surprised by the number of subscribers<p>> The threat actor exported the blog mailing list email addresses, which was a total of 3759 email addresses.<p>3700 addresses doesn't seem like that much at all.
Off the cuff thought, but I wonder if the early days of modern banking were marred with such blatant fraud and deceit.<p>I think of stage coach robberies of US bonds, and the various bank “rug-pulls” (to use crypto fraud nomenclature) that occurred before the Coinage act of 1857 - but it’s such distant history it’s hard to find how people felt about it at the time.<p>What I’m getting at is this - is crypto fraud innate to it’s very essence, or did all “advancements” in banking technology have the same problem before everyone settled in and “got used” to attempts at fraud.