Home

4 comments

danjc11 months ago
An article that is staggeringly sparse on information.
08234987234987211 months ago
If you think a beer ad might be more informative than TFA, here&#x27;s Wimbledon&#x27;s resident hawk: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=CST629ad4bU" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=CST629ad4bU</a>
评论 #40898854 未加载
ggm11 months ago
Most of the article is uninformative. They switched to 100% ryegrass, it&#x27;s more resilient and grows straighter making for a more even court which endures.<p>Wimbledon has a lot of rest time. Other pitches fare worse, have more varied and heavy use year round.<p>A lot of modern stadium grass pitches have invested heavily in removable central sections, so cricket can have a chance to share the ground with rugby. And, carefully constructed gravel and sand underbed for optimal drainage. Fans wax lyrical about hallowed turf and its possible for sentiment reasons they keep a few corms of the original turf but honestly? Modern grass is probably better than the old sward, sports-wise. They can cover it with flooring for an Adele concert and be back in usable state for play in under a month.<p>Doing cricket commentary for TV South African born but English captain Tony Greig used to hack at the cracks in the 22 yards with his car keys. The groundsmen would have hated him. Sorry Caw-Kies.
评论 #40897956 未加载
评论 #40898011 未加载
评论 #40898360 未加载
vr4611 months ago
Crap article. Here’s a better one on pitch grass and turf.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;football&#x2F;2021&#x2F;jun&#x2F;15&#x2F;silicon-valley-of-turf-uk-perfect-football-pitch" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;football&#x2F;2021&#x2F;jun&#x2F;15&#x2F;silicon-val...</a>