Blogspam for <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/youtube-training-data-apple-nvidia-anthropic/" rel="nofollow">https://www.wired.com/story/youtube-training-data-apple-nvid...</a> and <a href="https://www.proofnews.org/apple-nvidia-anthropic-used-thousands-of-swiped-youtube-videos-to-train-ai/" rel="nofollow">https://www.proofnews.org/apple-nvidia-anthropic-used-thousa...</a>
I hadn't realized that it was well settled that scraping from youtube isn't legitimate. How ironic that would be. Does that mean that google search results aren't legal? You get full images back from that and google makes money on those results. They have trained search algorithms on those results too. Does that mean every site that they broke the TOS of when they scraped it and trained on it can sue them? Is there a real legal precedence that has set a clear line here?