This is kind of a shame. I understand that the commercial linux companies can't have a community variant using their name once the commercial project deviates from the open one, but it honestly does more damage to the overall linux ecosystem to have all these variants without a clear understanding how they are related.<p>We saw this years ago when the community version of redhat was renamed to fedora. It's very confusing for getting new people into linux, when the community distros are named different from the commercial distros. Someone that is aware of jobs using RHEL might not even realize using fedora will get them skills they need to transition to those jobs.